Artwork

Inhalt bereitgestellt von USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations, Fred Cook, and University of Southern California. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations, Fred Cook, and University of Southern California oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!

High Conflict: Understanding Polarization with Bestselling Author Amanda Ripley

39:39
 
Teilen
 

Manage episode 290098386 series 2756647
Inhalt bereitgestellt von USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations, Fred Cook, and University of Southern California. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations, Fred Cook, and University of Southern California oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

In her book “High Conflict: Why We Get Trapped and How We Get Out,” journalist and author Amanda Ripley introduces the framework that there are two types of conflict: high conflict and good conflict. In America, Ripley believes that we are stuck in a vicious cycle of high conflict — one that is destructive and unproductive. But as Ripley tells us, there is still hope for the future, for us to return to a place of good conflict.

In this episode, Fred and Amanda discuss some of the ways that corporate communications are impacted by high conflict and might play a role in supporting the return to good conflict, as well as how we can best communicate the facts to our audiences in a time when people find it increasingly difficult to agree on what the facts even are.

This discussion is part of our series on the 2021 Global Communication Report on public relations, available now at https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations/global-communication-report.

For more, check out the playback of the 31st Kenneth Owler Smith Symposium at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78YQGTFQpP8

Featuring:

Amanda Ripley (@amandaripley), New York Times Bestselling Author and journalist

Host:

Fred Cook (@fredcook), Chairman Emeritus of Golin, a global public relations firm. Author of “Improvise - Unorthodox Career Advice from an Unlikely CEO” and Director of the USC Center for Public Relations

Follow us: @USCCenter4PR (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram)

Newsletter: News from the USC Center for Public Relations

Visit our website: https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations

Key Words:

Public relations, polarization, politics, media, election, business, government, purpose, communications, unity, #PRFuture, high conflict, journalism, good conflict

A production of the USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations at the University of Southern California.

  continue reading

34 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 
Manage episode 290098386 series 2756647
Inhalt bereitgestellt von USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations, Fred Cook, and University of Southern California. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations, Fred Cook, and University of Southern California oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

In her book “High Conflict: Why We Get Trapped and How We Get Out,” journalist and author Amanda Ripley introduces the framework that there are two types of conflict: high conflict and good conflict. In America, Ripley believes that we are stuck in a vicious cycle of high conflict — one that is destructive and unproductive. But as Ripley tells us, there is still hope for the future, for us to return to a place of good conflict.

In this episode, Fred and Amanda discuss some of the ways that corporate communications are impacted by high conflict and might play a role in supporting the return to good conflict, as well as how we can best communicate the facts to our audiences in a time when people find it increasingly difficult to agree on what the facts even are.

This discussion is part of our series on the 2021 Global Communication Report on public relations, available now at https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations/global-communication-report.

For more, check out the playback of the 31st Kenneth Owler Smith Symposium at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78YQGTFQpP8

Featuring:

Amanda Ripley (@amandaripley), New York Times Bestselling Author and journalist

Host:

Fred Cook (@fredcook), Chairman Emeritus of Golin, a global public relations firm. Author of “Improvise - Unorthodox Career Advice from an Unlikely CEO” and Director of the USC Center for Public Relations

Follow us: @USCCenter4PR (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram)

Newsletter: News from the USC Center for Public Relations

Visit our website: https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations

Key Words:

Public relations, polarization, politics, media, election, business, government, purpose, communications, unity, #PRFuture, high conflict, journalism, good conflict

A production of the USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations at the University of Southern California.

  continue reading

34 Episoden

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

Kurzanleitung