Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!
“What do RP’s tools tell us about giving $100m to AW or GHD?” by Hayley Clatterbuck, arvomm, Bob Fischer, Derek Shiller, David_Moss
Manage episode 444222368 series 3281452
Intro
Suppose you have $100M to give away. You are drawn to the many important opportunities to reduce animal suffering or address pressing issues in global health and development. Your choice about how to allocate the funds could depend on considerations like these:
- Moral values: How much moral weight do you assign to various non-human species? Are you focused exclusively on hedonic considerations, like reducing suffering? Or do you have other relevant values, such as autonomy?
- Cost-effectiveness estimates: Species-discounting aside, how many DALYs/$ do the best projects in the area achieve? How fast do returns diminish in these areas?
- Decision-theoretic values: How do you feel about risk-taking? Are you willing to tolerate a substantial probability that projects will fail? What about non-trivial chances of projects backfiring?
- Second-order effects: Will giving to one cause set benefit any of your other values? Are there speculative benefits that might flow from [...]
---
Outline:
(00:09) Intro
(02:47) Cross-Cause Cost-Effectiveness Model
(02:51) How it works
(04:25) What it says
(06:53) Portfolio Builder Tool
(06:57) How it works
(08:12) What it says
(10:32) Moral Parliament Tool
(10:36) How it works
(11:48) What it says
(12:02) Parliament composition matters
(14:10) Allocation strategy matters
(17:27) Conclusions
The original text contained 5 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
The original text contained 11 images which were described by AI.
---
First published:
October 7th, 2024
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
256 Episoden
Manage episode 444222368 series 3281452
Intro
Suppose you have $100M to give away. You are drawn to the many important opportunities to reduce animal suffering or address pressing issues in global health and development. Your choice about how to allocate the funds could depend on considerations like these:
- Moral values: How much moral weight do you assign to various non-human species? Are you focused exclusively on hedonic considerations, like reducing suffering? Or do you have other relevant values, such as autonomy?
- Cost-effectiveness estimates: Species-discounting aside, how many DALYs/$ do the best projects in the area achieve? How fast do returns diminish in these areas?
- Decision-theoretic values: How do you feel about risk-taking? Are you willing to tolerate a substantial probability that projects will fail? What about non-trivial chances of projects backfiring?
- Second-order effects: Will giving to one cause set benefit any of your other values? Are there speculative benefits that might flow from [...]
---
Outline:
(00:09) Intro
(02:47) Cross-Cause Cost-Effectiveness Model
(02:51) How it works
(04:25) What it says
(06:53) Portfolio Builder Tool
(06:57) How it works
(08:12) What it says
(10:32) Moral Parliament Tool
(10:36) How it works
(11:48) What it says
(12:02) Parliament composition matters
(14:10) Allocation strategy matters
(17:27) Conclusions
The original text contained 5 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
The original text contained 11 images which were described by AI.
---
First published:
October 7th, 2024
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
256 Episoden
Alle Folgen
×Willkommen auf Player FM!
Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.