Episode 127 feat Dopingexpert Edmund Willison: Doping in Tennis (Sinnercase) EXTENDED
Manage episode 458457026 series 3629608
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Jannik Schneider, Daniel Masur, Jannik Schneider, and Daniel Masur. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Jannik Schneider, Daniel Masur, Jannik Schneider, and Daniel Masur oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Nearly two hours podcast with one of the most accomplished dopingexperts in recent years - Edmund Willison - who works as a freelancer for ARD Doping Redaktion, TV stations and newspapers and publishes a dopingnewsletter on Substack (https://honestsport.substack.com/) We talk about Doping in Sports, Doping in Tennis in general and break down the Sinnercase (start minute 37.30) as good and critical as possible. It is about the contaminationcase, the role of the team, many other cases in Italy with that substance, the legal side of the case. We go detail by detail and inform you the best way possible
…
continue reading
Kapitel
1. Intro - presentation Edmund Willison - how we met and work with each other (00:00:00)
2. How Edmund got interested into the dopingtopic (00:07:30)
3. Why is tennis a good sport to dope (00:14:35)
4. Why no one is talking about doping in tennis? (00:21:30)
5. Wrong narratives with testingprogrammes (00:30:00)
6. Different tests in different countries (00:35:00)
7. summary of the facts Sinner-Case (00:37:30)
8. Sinners contamination-explanation (00:42:30)
9. Details and inconsistencies in the Sinnercase (00:46:35)
10. Edmunds piece about Clostebolcases in Italy (00:51:05)
11. How quickly Clostebol disappears from the body? (00:57:00)
12. Fitnesscoach/Physio fired this week/ punishment for posession?? (01:07:00)
13. Experts independent? (01:10:00)
14. Is this contamination believeable? (01:13:00)
15. Tennisstars/experts talk (on purpose) wrong about doping (01:19:00)
16. The legal side of the case (01:23:30)
17. Conflict of interests: Lawyers work in different cases (01:30:00)
18. summary of the case (01:37:00)
19. Is the ITIA aggressive enough? (01:39:30)
20. Should there be shorter bans? (01:46:30)
21. Constructive suggestions/Outro (01:50:00)
164 Episoden