Artwork

Inhalt bereitgestellt von Kathryn Rubino and Kathryn Rubino at Above the Law. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Kathryn Rubino and Kathryn Rubino at Above the Law oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!

The Case Against Family Court with Jane Spinak - Episode 153

32:54
 
Teilen
 

Manage episode 383052531 series 2585842
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Kathryn Rubino and Kathryn Rubino at Above the Law. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Kathryn Rubino and Kathryn Rubino at Above the Law oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Kathryn and guest Jane Spinak, a Columbia Law School professor, discuss the issues with the U.S. court system's handling of child delinquencies. Jane argues that the system causes more harm than good, often exacerbating issues rather than resolving them. She believes the approach towards these cases should be shifted from courts to supporting communities, to provide more beneficial outcomes for families and children. Jane also calls for the abolition of family courts as they fail to address underlying problems like poverty and structural inequality. She encourages a focus on listening to and aligning with impacted communities for a more supportive system.

Highlights

  • The understanding of advocacy as advocating for a family, not just a child or parent
  • The lack of effectiveness of the court in solving issues that stem from structural inequalities
  • Keeping supports as much as possible within communities and examples of effective approaches
  • Addressing potential criticisms of the abolition proposal in regards to the reporting system
  • Acknowledgement that sometimes intervention and court proceedings are necessary for serious cases
  • Jane’s abolitionist mindset, advocating for reforms that dismantle the court, not strengthen it
  • The detention of extremely young children, not understanding the meaning behind their punishment
  • Adopting the international standard of 14 years for criminal responsibility
  • The need for supportive assistance for children and their parents instead of legal punishment
  • Why punitive measures should be ended
  • Proposed abolitionist agenda and that the courts should only come into play when a legal proceeding is necessary but should not attempt to solve social problems

Episode Resources

Episode Sponsored By https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexisplus

Subscribe, Share and Review To get the next episode subscribe with your favorite podcast player.

  continue reading

171 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 
Manage episode 383052531 series 2585842
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Kathryn Rubino and Kathryn Rubino at Above the Law. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Kathryn Rubino and Kathryn Rubino at Above the Law oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Kathryn and guest Jane Spinak, a Columbia Law School professor, discuss the issues with the U.S. court system's handling of child delinquencies. Jane argues that the system causes more harm than good, often exacerbating issues rather than resolving them. She believes the approach towards these cases should be shifted from courts to supporting communities, to provide more beneficial outcomes for families and children. Jane also calls for the abolition of family courts as they fail to address underlying problems like poverty and structural inequality. She encourages a focus on listening to and aligning with impacted communities for a more supportive system.

Highlights

  • The understanding of advocacy as advocating for a family, not just a child or parent
  • The lack of effectiveness of the court in solving issues that stem from structural inequalities
  • Keeping supports as much as possible within communities and examples of effective approaches
  • Addressing potential criticisms of the abolition proposal in regards to the reporting system
  • Acknowledgement that sometimes intervention and court proceedings are necessary for serious cases
  • Jane’s abolitionist mindset, advocating for reforms that dismantle the court, not strengthen it
  • The detention of extremely young children, not understanding the meaning behind their punishment
  • Adopting the international standard of 14 years for criminal responsibility
  • The need for supportive assistance for children and their parents instead of legal punishment
  • Why punitive measures should be ended
  • Proposed abolitionist agenda and that the courts should only come into play when a legal proceeding is necessary but should not attempt to solve social problems

Episode Resources

Episode Sponsored By https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexisplus

Subscribe, Share and Review To get the next episode subscribe with your favorite podcast player.

  continue reading

171 Episoden

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

Kurzanleitung