Inhalt bereitgestellt von Chris Abraham. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Chris Abraham oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!
S7E6 Geeking Out Over Tool Watches with ChatGPT 4o
Manage episode 423607709 series 2515319
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Chris Abraham. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Chris Abraham oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Welcome to Season 7, Episode 6 of The Chris Abraham Show! In this episode, Chris Abraham and ChatGPT explore the fascinating world of tool watches. From the history and evolution of iconic brands like Rolex and Omega to modern military preferences and the timeless appeal of Citizen watches, we cover it all. Chris shares his personal journey with tool watches, starting from his childhood in Hawaii, his experiences with JROTC and scuba diving, and his obsession with dive watches. We dive into his collection, including the Seiko Divers 63097040, Marathon 41mm Navigator, various Casio G-Shocks, and his recent favorite, the Citizen Certified Diver. Join us as we discuss the significance of tool watches, their transition from essential equipment to luxury items, and the modern innovations that keep them relevant today. Whether you’re a watch enthusiast or just curious, this episode is packed with insights and stories that you won’t want to miss. Q: What is a tool watch? A: A tool watch is designed for practical use in specific activities or professions, such as diving, aviation, or military operations. They are known for their durability, functionality, and reliability. Q: Why are quartz watches preferred over automatic watches for some people? A: Quartz watches are generally more accurate, require less maintenance, and are more durable compared to automatic watches, making them ideal for active and demanding environments. Q: What are some popular tool watch brands? A: Popular tool watch brands include Rolex, Omega, Seiko, Citizen, Casio (G-Shock), Marathon, and Suunto. Q: What is Tritium lume? A: Tritium lume is a type of luminescence used in watches that provides a constant glow without needing an external light source. It uses tritium gas tubes that emit light continuously for many years. Q: How have tool watches evolved in modern times? A: Modern tool watches have integrated advanced technologies such as GPS, heart rate monitoring, and other smart features. Brands like Garmin and Suunto offer multifunctional watches that cater to outdoor and military needs. ABC (Altimeter, Barometer, Compass): Features commonly found in outdoor and tactical watches to provide environmental data and navigation assistance. Tritium Lume: A self-illuminating technology used in watches that glows continuously without needing an external light source. Quartz Movement: A type of watch movement powered by a battery and regulated by a quartz crystal, known for its accuracy and low maintenance. Automatic Movement: A watch movement powered by the motion of the wearer’s wrist, typically requiring more maintenance than quartz watches. NATO Strap: A durable, fabric watch strap that passes under the watch case, providing added security and comfort. Dive Watch: A watch designed for underwater use, typically featuring water resistance, a unidirectional bezel, and strong lume for visibility in low light conditions.
…
continue reading
336 Episoden
Manage episode 423607709 series 2515319
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Chris Abraham. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Chris Abraham oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Welcome to Season 7, Episode 6 of The Chris Abraham Show! In this episode, Chris Abraham and ChatGPT explore the fascinating world of tool watches. From the history and evolution of iconic brands like Rolex and Omega to modern military preferences and the timeless appeal of Citizen watches, we cover it all. Chris shares his personal journey with tool watches, starting from his childhood in Hawaii, his experiences with JROTC and scuba diving, and his obsession with dive watches. We dive into his collection, including the Seiko Divers 63097040, Marathon 41mm Navigator, various Casio G-Shocks, and his recent favorite, the Citizen Certified Diver. Join us as we discuss the significance of tool watches, their transition from essential equipment to luxury items, and the modern innovations that keep them relevant today. Whether you’re a watch enthusiast or just curious, this episode is packed with insights and stories that you won’t want to miss. Q: What is a tool watch? A: A tool watch is designed for practical use in specific activities or professions, such as diving, aviation, or military operations. They are known for their durability, functionality, and reliability. Q: Why are quartz watches preferred over automatic watches for some people? A: Quartz watches are generally more accurate, require less maintenance, and are more durable compared to automatic watches, making them ideal for active and demanding environments. Q: What are some popular tool watch brands? A: Popular tool watch brands include Rolex, Omega, Seiko, Citizen, Casio (G-Shock), Marathon, and Suunto. Q: What is Tritium lume? A: Tritium lume is a type of luminescence used in watches that provides a constant glow without needing an external light source. It uses tritium gas tubes that emit light continuously for many years. Q: How have tool watches evolved in modern times? A: Modern tool watches have integrated advanced technologies such as GPS, heart rate monitoring, and other smart features. Brands like Garmin and Suunto offer multifunctional watches that cater to outdoor and military needs. ABC (Altimeter, Barometer, Compass): Features commonly found in outdoor and tactical watches to provide environmental data and navigation assistance. Tritium Lume: A self-illuminating technology used in watches that glows continuously without needing an external light source. Quartz Movement: A type of watch movement powered by a battery and regulated by a quartz crystal, known for its accuracy and low maintenance. Automatic Movement: A watch movement powered by the motion of the wearer’s wrist, typically requiring more maintenance than quartz watches. NATO Strap: A durable, fabric watch strap that passes under the watch case, providing added security and comfort. Dive Watch: A watch designed for underwater use, typically featuring water resistance, a unidirectional bezel, and strong lume for visibility in low light conditions.
…
continue reading
336 Episoden
Alle Folgen
×The Secret Safety Net We Pretend Doesn’t Exist You can live your whole life in this country without ever seeing the crawlspace you’re standing on. America has always flirted with the idea of a safety net — food assistance, cheap clinics, housing vouchers — but never enough to make it real in daylight. Try to codify a European-style welfare system here and you’ll run headlong into the one thing voters agree on: taxes feel like theft. Better dead than red, they used to say. They meant it. So we build a workaround instead. We keep Dad’s “no free rides” sign nailed to the fridge, but Mom slips you a folded twenty when he’s not looking. The churches, the Peace Corps, the food pantries, the “private” non-profits — all humming on the hush-hush drip of federal dollars and tax breaks we pretend are charity. It’s a black market of democratic socialism. A secret fridge in the basement that keeps half the family fed without ever saying the word “entitlement.” To the 30% — the Zohran Mamdanis, the real social democrats — this basement is roses. Proof America still has a heart, even if it beats in the dark. But to the other 70% — the Iron Dad bloc — it’s mold. Moral decay. The smell of other people’s laziness rotting the beams you paid for with your sweat. Same fridge, same kids on the futon. Roses for you, rot for them. This is the contradiction that can’t last forever. The workaround lives or dies by the lease. If Congress won’t pass it, if the people won’t vote for it, it survives by executive order alone — one pen stroke away from erasure every four years. And the next Iron Dad always comes. Trump wasn’t the first to smell mold in the basement. He’s just the one who walked in with the crowbar and the mandate to rip it to the studs. And when the landlord — the people — say “Tear it out,” you don’t get to complain that you never filed the permit. But don’t fool yourself: not every rose down there is real. When you push your mercy off the books, you hire mercenaries to run it. Just like soldiers cost pennies but Blackwater costs a thousand a day, your shadow social safety net runs on grift. CEOs who skim millions while calling it charity. “Community organizers” who bleed admin fees and grant padding. Plastic roses dusted with rosewater, all fed by tax dollars disguised as donations nobody voted for honestly. So now the mother’s purse is empty. The fridge hums until the inspector unplugs it. The basement you pretended didn’t exist is a tear-down lot waiting for the bulldozer. And the only question left is this: do you want the roses in the front yard — real, alive, funded in daylight — or do you want the mold ripped out by force every time the next Iron Dad calls the inspector? Vote for it. Pay for it. Tax yourself with your eyes open. Or stand barefoot on the dirt and pretend you’re free while you shiver. The basement was never free. And it never stays hidden forever.…
Foreign aid is dead — long live foreign aid. On July 1st, 2025, the U.S. Agency for International Development — USAID — shut its doors for good. An institution born under Kennedy to be America’s moral halo and Cold War firewall, it fed, healed, and built half the Global South for 60 years. Some say it saved 91 million lives; The Lancet says its closure could mean 14 million more deaths by 2030, a third of them kids. Bush calls that a tragedy. Obama calls it a colossal mistake. Bono writes a poem and cries. But the truth is harder to swallow: aid is a lifeline — but it’s also a leash. And America just yanked it. This is realpolitik with a humanitarian face. Kennedy made foreign aid a Trojan Horse of goodwill and soft control. You keep kids alive, you keep regimes in your orbit. Bush knew it — PEPFAR, his AIDS relief plan, was moral triage and evangelical diplomacy. Obama, ever the grown-up, saw it as soft power’s last best card: stabilizing failed states while creating new markets. But even he knew it was a moral leasehold — borrowed time for the world’s poorest, funded by taxpayers whose mercy has an expiration date. And then came the burn-it-down populists. Reagan once said the scariest words in the English language were: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” Elon Musk put that on a T-shirt, ran USAID through his “Department of Government Efficiency,” and called it fraud. Trump shrugged and told the base: why send 17 cents a day to Sudan when you can buy votes at home? Musk called it a criminal racket. And the landlord foreclosed. So here’s the raw question: is it better to live forever on a drip of pity — or drown free? AID is like AIDS meds: once you start, you can’t stop, or you die. In Sudan, five million lose healthcare overnight. In sub-Saharan Africa, PEPFAR’s cut means HIV deaths could spike again, kids orphaned by a policy pivot. Some will say America murdered them. But maybe they were already living on borrowed time. You can rage at the empire’s moral hypocrisy. You should. But also ask: would you build your family’s survival on the grace of someone else’s Congress, someone else’s donor mood, someone else’s tax politics? Would you build your castle on soft ground? In Hawaii, they’d say: never build on leased land owned by a Queen’s trust. Because the trust can pull the ground out any day. This is a story about the hard edge under the soft empire. It’s about the village that was saved — but never finished its own well. It’s about the landlord with the mercy kill switch. It’s about the moment the halo flickered out and the people left holding the bag realized they’d always been on the moral leash. So if I sound like an asshole for saying it — AITA? Probably. But the ground is still soft. And pity, like funding, always expires. Listen, think, argue — but ask yourself: what do you build when the lifeline’s gone?…
We always thought the real cultural coup would come from the ivory tower, the professors, the think tanks. Or maybe from the so-called “gay agenda” — whispered about by people who never once sat cross-legged in a high school hallway while the real conspirators held each other’s faces and wept over a monologue. But the truth is, it was never the tweedy wonks or the closeted cabal that would rewrite how we think about men, sexy, or strong. It was the theater kids — the first to “hold space” before it was a therapy buzzword, the ones who touched shoulders, played trees, sobbed backstage, and built the soft rebellion that is slowly, persistently, shaping what we want and who we want to be. This episode is my love letter and open-eyed critique of how “theater kid culture” gave birth to what I now call the flitty floof : a neologism for the soft-edged, touch-positive, self-aware energy that lives somewhere between a rock band peacock and your favorite protective dad. From Prince in purple lace and the hair bands of the ‘80s to the heroin chic boys of the ‘90s and today’s boulder-shouldered superheroes — it’s all part of the same swirl. Why does Pedro Pascal calling himself your “slutty daddy” break the internet? Why do we keep trying to “make fetch happen” with safe Zaddies like Stephen Colbert? And why does our idea of the masculine ideal keep bouncing between the bear hug dad bod, the thick-glasses sexy nerd, the stoic Bud Light dad, and the hyper-jacked Hemsworth with a body that was once coded gay? None of this is accidental. The flitty floof isn’t a slur — it’s my invented shorthand for the theater kid grown up, still holding space, still rewriting the script on what strong, soft, and sexy can look like. The point isn’t to force everyone into crop tops and massage circles in the cafeteria. The point is to remember that the soft permission the theater kids carved out — the freedom to flit, to floof, to drop the mask or wear it proudly — is an option, not a new closet. From the tree people who auditioned for the wind to the boulder shoulder heroes who now must starve themselves into superhero suits — every version of manhood has always been a costume and a stage direction. The only thing that lasts is the courage to stand under the lights and decide which lines are yours. Listen to hear me riff through Prince, hair bands, heroin chic, Zaddies, the old stoics, the metrosexual phase, the “male gaze” (and the “male gays”) — and how our hunger for what’s sexy and safe is always shaped by the kids backstage. This is not a takedown. It’s a thank you, a mirror, and a reminder: the theater kids still hold the pen, but your mouth is your own. Curtain.…
T
The Chris Abraham Show

How old ghosts, new lines, and our hungry machines keep us replaying the same pain Some family stories hum so loudly through the floorboards you never need to tell them out loud. My pop-pop thought he could outrun a ghost when he moved my nana to the end of a dead-end road in Spring Lake, New Jersey — hoping she’d stop drinking if she couldn’t walk to the bar. But the bottle came anyway. The phone line was always there. She’d drink and call people she thought were betraying the family. That’s how ghosts work: you can trap the body, but the pain finds the switchboard. I grew up with the soundtrack of ice cubes knocking against cheap glasses. Gin, whiskey, hush. My parents carried their ghosts the way their parents did — from Ireland, Budapest, Prague, the Atlantic — each migration another attempt to bury the coal seam deeper. But buried carbon never disappears. It waits. And someone always knows how to stoke it when they need the heat. This is what I mean by manufactured dissent . It’s not a conspiracy theory about trolls. It’s older than any algorithm. It’s the trick of pulling old grief — real, legitimate grief — back to the surface when it suits a bigger agenda. The trauma is genuine. The switchboard is what makes it dangerous. Look at Ukraine: the Holodomor — Stalin’s forced famine that starved millions — never went cold. It shaped a whole nation’s suspicion of Moscow. That wound was waiting. The West didn’t invent it, but knew exactly how to stoke it: promise “Never Again,” promise safety, promise revenge. And the carbon burns twice — once when it happens, again when it’s hooked up to a pipeline. Same story in Hawaii. The kingdom was stolen, the lands seized, the monarchy overthrown — real, raw memory buried under generations who mostly carried it in uncle-and-auntie stories, quiet anger, backyard beers. Now, that old coal seam is stoked again. Hashtags, TED talks, Duolingo lessons. Meanwhile, the rent climbs, the kids move away, and the ghost sells nicely for soft power points while the real problem festers. This isn’t blame. It’s confession. I quit drinking in 2020, but the hum never left my house. It just moved from glass to fridge to late-night scrolling. The ghost wants you to dial out. Someone always wants to pick up the other line. It’s the same with the Shoah. The Holocaust didn’t just scar history — it etched a commandment: Never Again. That moral line holds. But it’s also stoked, sometimes by the same people who’ll sell fear like fuel: politicians, arms dealers, settlers, true believers. The wound stays open because the machine needs it. None of this means the grief should be forgotten. It means you need to see the switchboard. Not every ghost wants to be a billboard. Some want a grave. Some want a witness. Some want silence. The hinge is knowing the difference before someone sells you to yourself. May you watch your floorboards. May you guard your line out. May you drink your own story, not the cheap boxed wine your enemies would brand for you. The ghost never dies — but you don’t have to keep stoking it for someone else’s war.…
America’s exhausted — and not just from inflation, rent, or the nine-to-five that turned into a nine-to-nine. There’s another kind of exhaustion we don’t name out loud: the fatigue of paying for people you don’t trust, programs you think don’t work, neighbors you swear game the system. It’s called poverty fatigue . Not the poverty itself — the fatigue of living shoulder-to-shoulder with it, funding it, hearing the stories: the lobster on EBT, the Cadillac Queen, the able-bodied guy who says he’s too sick to work but somehow does odd jobs for cash. Some of it’s myth. Some of it’s real. All of it sits in your gut when you see your taxes go up and your block stay the same. This is not new. Reagan’s “welfare queen” was a fable with a shred of truth. It became moral fuel for a generation who felt they were scraping while others schemed. The resentment stuck. I’ve lived in Germany and England. There, the safety net is a hammock . If you fall, you bounce gently — unemployment benefits, housing, healthcare, all catch you before you crack your teeth. In America, the net is a frayed fishing line six inches off the pavement. Fall, break your nose, then maybe the line snags your ankle before you hit rock bottom. COVID gave Americans a glimpse of a higher net — stimulus checks, beefed-up unemployment. It didn’t last. But that brief taste burned the question in people’s heads: Why can’t it feel like this all the time? Meanwhile, the Left drifted deeper into temple-and-lepers politics: defending the most marginalized, the truly destitute, the moral symbols of the kingdom of heaven. And that’s good — but they forgot about the plumbers, the line cooks, the Uber dads. They forgot the working class is the real populist block: huge in number, deeply skeptical, and always aware of who’s actually scraping and who’s skating. Now enter Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. Massive tax cuts for the rich and the working class: no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime. Does it mostly help billionaires? Absolutely. Does the deficit explode? Sure. But it’s also the only bone tossed to the middle — the people who think they’ll never get a European hammock and are tired of carrying someone else’s weight. The new wave — folks like Zohran Mamdani in New York — have made it explicit: democracy means democratic socialism. More programs. More net. More taxes. And the Right knows it, which is why you hear: “We’re a republic, not a democracy!” It’s not pedantry; it’s a gut check. They see the variable change — and they push back. This is the part the Left misses: fatigue mutates. It turns into blame. Blame turns into votes. Poverty fatigue is real — and it votes. The same people who say blessed are the poor on Sunday want their streets back on Monday. They want to believe in the safety net — but they don’t trust Caesar to hold it up. So when Trump stands there and says, “I see you — here’s something for you, too,” it lands. Because they’d rather be thrown a bone now than told the hammock is coming later. Poverty fatigue is bigger than the budget line. It’s deeper than the think tank numbers. It’s moral, primal, petty, and American as hell. And it’s not going away. Chris Abraham writes about the psychic costs of the safety net, the kingdom of heaven, and the busted street math we all do when nobody’s looking.…
Reference Source: NPR Code Switch : Dispatches from the living memory of trans people of color Identity, Stealth, and Staying Submarine When the Wolves Come Out I heard a line on Code Switch that stuck with me: “I’m staying in my lane. I can’t speak for you.” This is my lane. I’m not your hero or blueprint. I’m just a man with a few stories — potatoes in a rock soup — about how identity can be sanctuary, then trap, then survival trick when the world turns mean. I first learned what I call the vampire door in Norwich, England, 1990. By day it was farmers and muddy boots. By night some of those same men slipped through the door of the town’s lone gay disco. A pint in hand, glitter on the collar, nod to the bouncer. An orbit under Donna Summer. Then cloak back up before sunrise. It was a door you stepped through when you needed to be seen — and stepped back out when you needed to be safe. I carried that logic home with me: the door always swings both ways. But I’d felt that door long before England. At GW in 1988, I was living blocks from Dupont Circle — one of the loudest, bravest queer neighborhoods in America. Back then D.C. was neon and sweat: drag races on 17th, basement bars, whole blocks that felt like portals. My friends and I — queer, straight, shape-shifters — learned fast: the bar at seven is family, the bar at eleven is the pack. If you don’t feel the shift, you don’t make it home. Later I saw the same logic online. The WELL, The MetaNetwork — early “walled gardens” that needed a password, a vouch. Small. Sacred. Not because they hid treasure, but because meaning leaks when the wrong eyes peek in. That’s why I still love my Freemason lodge. Anyone can see the charity dinner — but when the doors close, there’s a man with a sword. Context is fragile. Leak the lodge, salt the garden. People hear stealth and think it’s fear. Sometimes stealth is just strategy. Like a concealed-carry instructor once told me: “The best weapon is the one nobody knows you have.” Same for your identity. Don’t print it on a flag when you know the street outside is still 1950. Sometimes staying submarine is how you get to YAWP again tomorrow. Walt Whitman’s YAWP is America’s big queer shout — but this country loves it embalmed. The living version it fears. The louder you glow, the more antibodies you summon. You become uranium: radiant, potent, and a perfect fuel for the machine that’ll spin you up and point you back at yourself. That’s how the pack does it now. Not clubs or chains, but money and legal twists. Look at Skrmetti: SCOTUS upholds Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors. Or Planned Parenthood: the Court says states can block Medicaid for everything — contraception, cancer checks, not just abortion. Sanctions turned inward. The message is simple: amputate the piece that makes us squirm, or starve. The bar at seven is your found family. The bar at eleven is the werewolves. And the pack is bigger than a club — it’s donors, lawyers, ghost rules from 1950 still sitting in the court. You can’t extrapolate the sweaty Pride float to the rest of the country. The vibe shift is real. The pack is always circling. So here’s my lane. I was never the hero. I was the shape-shifter who knew when to slip back through the vampire door before the vibe turned. Pretty enough to drink your Absolut — smart enough to leave before you asked me to explain. I’m not telling you to hide forever. I’m telling you: visibility is power if you understand how the pack moves. Stealth is not shame — it’s strategy. Context is a garden. Spill it for clout, and you salt the soil. Your YAWP is holy. So is your cloak. Stay submarine when you need to. Always gone before eleven.…
Enlightenment Isn’t Loud. It Mops Floors. There’s a saying in Zen: “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” It sounds violent, but it isn’t. It’s a warning — against false idols, against ego, against brandishing your enlightenment like a badge. Because the real Buddha doesn’t announce himself. He doesn’t post about it. He certainly doesn’t go on speaking tours. The real Buddha might be mopping the floors after the high school prom. She might be your mother, quietly cooking soup for the neighbor with cancer. He might be the hospice nurse who holds your father's hand when the morphine finally wins. No livestream. No accolades. Just presence. Just grace. I’ve seen them. Not the floating monks — though I do believe some can levitate — but the ones who hover just above despair. The ones who carry the weight with silence and kindness. My teachers in Hawaii, Mrs. Kai and Mrs. Sakai, were Buddhas. They didn’t teach Buddhism. They taught everything that matters. With chalk. With laughter. With patience for a kid who didn’t always deserve it. In Nepal in the ‘90s, I met a monk who tapped me on the shoulder and asked for the International Herald Tribune . It was folded in my back pocket, under a jumper — completely invisible. He hadn’t seen it. He knew. You don’t forget moments like that. You just tuck them away, like seeds, until they bloom. The truth is: we miss most of the Buddhas. We’re too distracted. We expect enlightenment to glow like Times Square. But it doesn’t. It whispers. It blends in. You can sit next to it on the bus and never know. Our brains filter out the miraculous — and maybe that’s part of the mercy. When I got my concealed carry permit in Arlington, the chief made me promise three things: Don’t announce it. Don’t let it print. And never, ever brandish. That’s how I think about real spiritual power. If it’s loud, it’s probably not real. If it demands attention, it’s probably ego. The Buddha doesn’t brandish. The Christ doesn’t post. The Tao doesn’t demand followers. They serve. But that’s the problem today. Everyone wants to be the vanguard. No one wants to be the janitor. Everyone wants to “lead the revolution” — once they finish their speaking engagement. Everyone wants to speak “for the trees,” as if the trees filed a request. But when it’s time to wash dishes, sit with the dying, or change a stranger’s wound dressing — they’re suddenly busy. It’s all mañana. Once the utopia arrives. Once the revolution is over. Once the equity audits are done and the right words are found — then we’ll help. Then we’ll serve. Then we’ll be kind. But never now. Never dirty. Never humbled. Never barefoot in a borrowed kitchen, ladling stew for someone who smells like regret. I don’t want that kind of progress. Buddha nature is not theoretical. It’s incarnate. And it lives in the ones who do — not the ones who preach. It glows faintly behind the eyes of the ones who carry burdens and never mention it. It stirs in the hospice volunteers, the sandwich makers, the unknown caregivers, and yes, the sons who sleep on couches for a year while their mothers die slowly from cancer. That doesn’t make me a Buddha. Far from it. But I’ve seen the ones who are. And they don’t need followers. They don’t need blogs. They don’t even need credit. They just cut wood, carry water, and vanish before the applause.…
T
The Chris Abraham Show

I Am Whatever Kind of Commie Kurt Vonnegut Was Am I a commie? Yes—but not the kind they warned you about. Not the doctrinaire type. Not the utopian. Not the bureaucrat. I don’t want to flatten everyone to the same mediocrity. I don’t want to abolish excellence, or demand purity tests, or see the world through the lens of enforcement and compliance. I believe in decency, not dogma. I believe no one should suffer for being poor. I believe cruelty should never be efficient. I believe dignity is a right, not a commodity. That’s the kind of commie I am—and that’s exactly the kind of commie Kurt Vonnegut was. Vonnegut’s politics weren’t ideological in the party-platform sense. He was a moralist, a satirist, and a deeply wounded humanist. His experience in World War II, especially surviving the firebombing of Dresden, left him with a permanent allergy to patriotic lies and institutional violence. In fiction and in life, he exposed systems that grind people into pulp—and mocked the bureaucrats who call that “order.” But satire was just the method. The message was always moral. And his lodestar was Eugene V. Debs: American socialist, labor organizer, and five-time presidential candidate, who was sentenced to ten years in prison for saying working men shouldn’t be forced to kill other working men for the benefit of bankers. Vonnegut quoted Debs constantly. Not as a nostalgic nod, but with spiritual seriousness. If Vonnegut ever built a shrine, Debs would have been on it. Not Marx. Not Lenin. Debs. The man who said, “While there is a soul in prison, I am not free.” That’s not just a line. That’s the whole faith. I came to see myself that way slowly. I didn’t grow up red. I wasn’t raised a socialist. I grew up American—meaning I was taught to believe that if you worked hard and followed the rules, you’d be okay. Then I saw what happened to the people who did everything right and still got buried. I watched friends lose jobs, homes, and futures. I watched war after war justified by noble slogans. I watched the language of justice get captured, repackaged, and sold back to us by corporate consultants. By 2016, something had snapped. I didn’t become pro-Trump. I became anti-anti-Trump. Because the people yelling loudest about decency and democracy didn’t seem to care about wages, rent, insulin, or war. They cared about manners. About terminology. About signaling their virtue, not exercising it. I didn’t see a populist Left—I saw a managerial class obsessed with optics and terrified of the poor. What I believe has never changed: healthcare is a right. Housing is a right. War is obscene. Empire is a scam. People matter. The working class matters. We should measure a society not by its rhetoric but by how it treats the weakest person in the room. If your politics can’t start there, I don’t care what team you’re on. That’s not my Left. That’s not my communism. My kind of communism says: feed the hungry, house the vulnerable, end the wars, tell the truth, and don’t pretend cruelty is neutral. That’s not ideology. That’s human decency. So yes, I’m a commie. A Vonnegut commie. A Debs commie. A plainspoken, anti-cruelty, anti-bullshit, solidarity-over-slogans, material-reality-first kind of commie. I don’t want your revolution. I want your empathy. I want to make things less brutal, and I want to start now. Amen.…
We act like the missiles decide their targets. As if the Hellfire drone strike has free will. But in modern warfare—and in modern narrative warfare—the target isn’t a target until someone paints it. Laser-guided munitions don’t wake up one day and say, “That guy.” They wait. For a signal. A beam. A blinking beacon hidden under the floorboards. The ordnance doesn’t think. It follows. And in our endless info-war of vibes and virality, it’s the same. Redditors, TikTok rage reels, MeidasTouch-style echo chambers—those are just the munitions. They’re not autonomous. They’re reactive. What matters is: Who painted the target? Was it a whisper campaign? A blue-checked influencer who switched lanes? Was it a newsletter, a leak, a leak about a newsletter? Who snuck past the perimeter and aimed the dot? This is the essay. We don’t talk enough about the targeting package. The long-range recon patrol who slips behind lines to mark something—someone—as worthy of outrage. Maybe they parachuted in. Maybe they’re already embedded. Either way, their job is to illuminate. Then comes the kill chain: Think tank report (intel) Atlantic op-ed (authorization) Twitter thread (delivery) TikTok (warhead) You never even saw the spotter. One day, Trump is the darling of Manhattan media, a beloved caricature. The next, he’s worse than Hitler. Bin Laden? Our Cold War asset. Saddam? Our oil-stabilizing friend. Gaddafi? Photographed with Condi Rice’s mixtape on his nightstand. Then: all painted. All vaporized. Even Putin was “New Russia” once—mining nickel, flirting with NATO. Now he’s an eternal villain, an ex-KGB fascist oligarch. We changed the noun from industrialist to oligarch and thought we’d done analysis. Narrative paints. Facts arrive later. Ask yourself: Why wasn’t Obama painted? Or Biden? Or even Bush, in his second term? Naomi Wolf tried in 2007—she practically screamed “authoritarian creep!” —but her dot never caught the beam. Because the paint has to stick. The actor must be ready. The story must allow it. Trump? He welcomed the role. Signed the casting contract. Took the heel heat and ran with it like it was WrestleMania. “Make America Great Again” was a catchphrase, not a policy. It was kayfabe all the way down. He turned politics into wrestling. But who booked the match? It’s tempting to believe these men write their own roles. But come on. This is Stanford/Oxbridge season 6: Global Civics. These leaders come out of the same boarding schools, the same land-grant universities, the same think tanks and G20 mixers. Bad actors are cast. Sometimes they audition. Sometimes they’re just… available. And when their arc is up? Witness protection, or a tombstone with a question mark. Epstein. Elvis. Tupac. “Is he dead, or just reassigned?” The script demands turnover. You’re not going to understand power through a fascism bingo card. Power doesn’t yell its name. It whispers. It points. It paints. So stop obsessing over the missiles. The real question is: Who’s behind the brush? The Kill Chain of Public NarrativeThe Fickleness of TargetsTarget Painting Is The Real PowerThe Actor Doesn’t Write the ScriptRetire the Checklist, Follow the Laser…
You’ve seen the checklist. It’s been screenshotted, shared, color-coded, made into TikToks, and dropped into Reddit threads like gospel. “The 14 Signs of Fascism,” courtesy of Umberto Eco—saint of academic antifascists and patron thinker of Canva revolutionaries. And if you believe certain corners of the internet, Donald J. Trump has officially collected them all. Congratulations, America: you’ve unlocked the full Fascist Achievement Tree. Time to panic. But here’s the twist. This isn’t new. Trump didn’t write the script. He didn’t invent the stage. He just ad-libbed the vulgar version of a role America has been playing with better lighting and smoother diction for generations. You want fascist vibes? Look to the kill lists, the proxy wars, the alphabet soup of surveillance agencies. Look to Wounded Knee. Look to COINTELPRO. Look to “we tortured some folks.” That wasn’t Trump. That was bipartisan. This essay isn’t a defense of Trump. Far from it. This is a reckoning with the dangerous comfort of aesthetic antifascism —a ritualistic, self-congratulatory performance that mistakes moral panic for moral clarity. That confuses memes with mechanisms. That rebrands old critiques with new fonts and calls it resistance. Because when every bad actor is “literally fascist,” the word collapses under its own inflation. And worse— we stop recognizing the structural violence that doesn’t wear jackboots or tweet in all caps. We’re going to talk about Reddit. We’re going to talk about MidasTouch. We’re going to talk about how you can be downvoted to hell for quoting Umberto Eco correctly. We’ll invoke Naomi Wolf, back when she was howling at the moon over Bush-era imperial creep and was ignored for being too early, too loud, too right. We’ll talk about how anti-fascism turned from praxis into pageantry. From hard-won history into hashtag discourse. We’ll trace the co-opting of cultural resistance—from Morrissey to Springsteen, from U2 to the Breeders—into the soft-liberal, algorithm-approved soundtrack of brunch-era outrage. And we’ll hold up a mirror—not just to the Trumpist id, but to the institutions that birthed him, enabled him, and will survive him, wearing different suits and better cologne. So no, sweetiepie, your fascism checklist won’t save you. Not from Trump. Not from Biden. Not from the bureaucratic machinery of empire with a latte in its hand and a drone overhead. If anything, that laminated Eco list might just be your new comfort blanket—warm, moral, and useless against the cold mechanics of power. You want to fight fascism? You’d better start by understanding what it actually looks like—especially when it smiles back.…
Sources: Salon : Deliberative democracy: Sounds boring — but it just might save us Stanford : Could deliberative democracy depolarize America? Stanford scholars think so "Pedagogy or Programming? The Moral Case for Managed Consensus" Let’s imagine a generous reading of the deliberative democracy project—the one where Fishkin, Diamond, and maybe even Sommer Gentry aren’t scheming puppetmasters in a Stanford-branded lab, but earnest physicians treating a sick body politic. Under this view, deliberative democracy isn’t a tool for reeducation—it’s triage. It’s not an escape room for the politically deficient—it’s a refuge from the algorithmic inferno we’ve all been sleepwalking through. In an age where outrage is currency, and consensus is suspect, maybe creating a safe, structured space for pluralism isn’t authoritarian. Maybe it’s necessary . You could say: the experiment is the antidote. Yes, it smells paternalistic. Yes, it looks like programming. But look around—everything is programming now. TikTok. YouTube. Fox. MSNBC. Ragebait thumbnails and weaponized empathy loops. If every click already reshapes the public, maybe deliberative democracy is just counter-programming . If Stanford’s behavioral nudges are a velvet cage, then Twitter is a behavioral meat grinder. So what if we flip the script? What if nudging isn’t coercion but a moral obligation—when the civic arena is already saturated with weaponized behavioral design? What if using color revolution tactics on ourselves is a kind of inoculation, a way to protect a pluralistic republic from its own digital autoimmune disorders? In this reading, the voter is not a rat. They’re a patient. Deliberative polling becomes a kind of democratic dialysis—filtering out toxins, restoring cognitive function, creating political coherence where before there was only tribal signal boosting and reactive posturing. The empathy isn't manufactured—it’s restored. The shift in views isn’t coerced—it’s coaxed, slowly, gently, through conversation, not confrontation. Critics call this infantilizing. Proponents might say: it’s an ethical reframing of political adulthood. Because maybe treating everyone like sovereign, fully autonomous agents in a weaponized information ecosystem is like sending 5th graders into a casino full of con men and propaganda booths. What if we do need a little civic scaffolding? What if treating voters as “electoral minors” is only condescending if you ignore the asymmetry of information warfare they're up against? After all, behavioral economics already reshaped how we shop, save, eat, and vote. What Fishkin offers is a version of that power used openly, accountably, and (in theory) neutrally . And then there’s the global precedent. Europe runs citizens’ assemblies. Mongolia runs constitutional deliberation weekends. Ireland used civic panels to move toward marriage equality. Even China, in places like Zeguo Township, has invited deliberative budgeting into its opaque governance layers. If managed consensus is such a dangerous tool, it’s strange that even authoritarian-adjacent regimes deploy it to stabilize and legitimize policy, not to eradicate dissent. Of course, the danger isn’t in deliberation—it’s in believing deliberation immunizes you from power’s corruptions. Paternalism always thinks it’s helping. But in moments of fracture, triage can feel tyrannical to those who didn’t choose the treatment. Still, if we believe democracy is more than mere arithmetic—if it is, in fact, a moral and epistemic project—then maybe we owe it to ourselves to create rituals of reason, however artificial they may initially seem. Deliberative democracy might not be perfect. But it could be the only operating table we have left before the patient flatlines.…
T
The Chris Abraham Show

The Supreme Court, the Rolex, and Why the Tallest Poppy Gets Cut There’s a meme making the rounds: a giant dust storm barreling toward a city, its face replaced with that of a fluffy dog. It’s labeled The Supreme Court . The city? A thriving modern society . It’s funny because it’s true. Or at least it feels true, which is how truth works now. But that meme is more than a punchline. It’s a warning. In this country, you don’t get to be 20% loud without provoking 70% backlash. That’s not justice—it’s equilibrium. America is a nation of pendulums and counterweights, and every moral breakthrough tends to summon an equal and opposite reaction. We don’t thrive just because we accelerate. We thrive because we maintain balance. And balance doesn’t come from pride parades or Supreme Court decisions. It comes from cultural equilibrium—hard-earned, often invisible, and rarely recognized until it’s gone. For years, gender-affirming care for minors existed quietly in hospitals, under the radar. Doctors helped. Families decided. No one needed to codify it. No one needed to protest it. It was the cultural equivalent of flying nap-of-the-earth. But once the discourse went national—once Pride became productized, once TikToks became performative—things got visible. Too visible. And visibility, in America, is dangerous. Ask anyone who collects watches. No one wears their Patek Philippe through Midtown anymore unless they’re going Uber Black to velvet rope. Why? Because the moment you show wealth, you become a target. Same logic applies to ideology. Identity. Visibility. When you grow too loud, you get noticed. And when you get noticed, you get packaged. And once you’re packaged, you’re a threat. Not because of who you are—but because of how far you’ve outpaced the consensus. I grew up in Hawaii, where there’s a phrase: the protruding nail gets hammered down . In Australia, they call it tall poppy syndrome —anyone who stands out too much gets cut back to size. This isn’t cruelty. It’s cohesion. That’s the lens I see all this through. It’s not about shrinking. It’s about surviving. It’s about understanding that the cultural immune system doesn’t respond with curiosity. It responds with eradication. Which brings us to the gray man —a concept from tactical culture: dress plain, act neutral, show nothing. Be forgettable. The gray man isn’t weak. He’s strategic. He survives because he doesn’t provoke engagement. He passes through the landscape without becoming a package. This isn’t a moral plea. It’s a survival memo. It’s not “do as I say, not as I do.” It’s “do as I do because I don’t want to see you crushed.” Yes, invisibility feels like masking. Like code-switching. Like erasure. But compared to getting hit by the legal equivalent of a brick to the head, it might just be the wisest tradeoff in an unjust world. The Supreme Court didn’t invent this reaction. It’s just institutionalizing what the culture was already preparing to do: hammer down the nail. Cut the poppy. Mug the person wearing the Rolex. Progress is real—but it’s not permanent, and it’s not evenly distributed. Sometimes the strongest move isn’t to stand tall—it’s to fly low. Not because you’re ashamed. But because you still have far to go. And you can’t get there if you don’t survive the storm.…
Trump Isn’t the Disease—He’s the Cold Sore What if the bull in the china shop is just what 70% of the country asked for? I don’t know how “good” Trump is as a legislator. Doesn’t matter. What is real is the immune response he triggered. Millions of Americans who felt cowed—ignored, belittled, scolded—saw in Trump a signal flare. Not because he’s polished or wise. Because he’s not. His chaos mirrors their rage. His vulgarity reflects their exhaustion. Voting for Trump isn’t a policy decision—it’s an act of sabotage. Not against America, but against the institutions that made them feel voiceless. DEI boards. HR departments. Elite universities. NPR accents. A system that told them they were wrong, evil, outdated—for existing. People call him “just loud and polarizing.” Sure. But so was punk rock. So was Malcolm X. Loudness isn’t evil—it’s often the tool of those who feel erased. This is cultural immunology . Trump’s second term is the fever after the body detects an ideological infection. The first 150 days have seen DEI layoffs, NGO collapses, equity hiring freezes, even USAID gutted. Universities, once untouchable, are now battlefield wreckage. And now, United States v. Skrmetti . The Supreme Court—6-3—upheld Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors. That decision didn’t come from nowhere. It’s the latest confirmation that, under Trump’s renewed mandate, the gloves are off. Courts, lawmakers, and governors are done pretending to align with progressive orthodoxy. They’re not afraid to act on the backlash. Trump isn’t doing all this personally. He doesn’t have to. He’s the accelerant. The lit match. The cold sore. Visible proof that something deeper is erupting. And no—I’m not saying it’s noble, kind, or just. Deportation is violent. Prison is dehumanizing. America has never promised kindness—only power and law. We confuse “rights” with moral grace. We imagine the Constitution as empathy. It’s not. We’ve tolerated fascist-adjacent systems for decades—as long as it stayed bureaucratic and discreet. But now? Now it’s on TV. Now it's named. Two million citizens are imprisoned in America today. No protests. No outcry. We call that justice. But detain a migrant, and suddenly it’s a moral crisis. The distinction is political theater. And that’s the point: Trump is just the symptom. Not the virus. Not the cause. He’s a cold sore erupting from years of suppressed discontent. Populist nationalism is the actual condition. He’s just the part that broke through the skin. He offers himself as the sin-eater—willing to be hated so others don’t have to be. And that’s why they love him. That’s why they keep voting for him. Not because they believe he’s good, but because he represents their refusal to submit. And let’s be honest: his global peers—Putin and Netanyahu—play the same role. Daddy figures. Chaos agents. “Authoritarian” is no longer a slur. It’s shorthand for finally, someone willing to act. No—I don’t revere Trump. But I understand his function. And until we understand what made him inevitable, we’re only going to see more of him. The left treats Trump voters like they’re under conservatorship. Like Britney Spears: too unstable to manage their own choices. That smug, condescending moral management is exactly why those voters set fire to the garden. Better salt the earth than be told how to tend it. Trump is not the disease. He’s just the cold sore. And America asked for him.…
No Medics, No Press, No Mercy: Modern War Doesn’t Believe You Anymore In theory, war has rules: press badges, medics, the Red Cross, the Geneva Conventions. But in practice—on the battlefield, on the street, or online— those protections are myths, not shields . And in 2025, no one in uniform truly believes in neutrality anymore. Whether in Gaza, Fallujah, or downtown Los Angeles, one reality has taken hold: Everyone is a combatant until cleared. Talk to JSOC operators, riot cops, drone pilots, or soldiers who’ve served in asymmetric warzones, and you’ll hear it without hesitation. Journalists, NGOs, charity workers, even medics— all are potential threats . Open-source intelligence (OSINT) has made everyone’s digital footprint an operational asset. What you post online can—and does—get you profiled in the field. A close friend of mine, a DIA interrogator embedded with a JSOC Little Bird unit in Iraq, once said it straight: “The vest doesn’t protect you—it flags you for vetting.” And if you’re wearing a vest labeled “PRESS” but tweeting like an activist? You’re not neutral. You’re narrative. And in modern conflict, narrative is firepower . No place illustrates this breakdown like Gaza. A population half under 18, with mosques doubling as command centers, apartment buildings as launchpads, and schools as arms caches. This doesn’t mean every Gazan is a militant—but no soldier in the field can afford to assume they’re not . That’s not a moral judgment. It’s a tactical one. The same logic applied in Vietnam, where children strapped bombs to their chests. It applied in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Kosovo. And it applies in America too—where during the George Floyd protests, even medics and credentialed journalists were shot, tear-gassed, tackled. Not because they were mistaken, but because they were no longer presumed neutral . Here’s a harder question no one wants to ask: If a population is truly oppressed, where’s the resistance? In occupied France, the Resistance bombed train tracks, assassinated collaborators, and ran sabotage cells. In Vietnam, even old women ran courier networks. But in Gaza? If Hamas is so hated, where are the Gazans fragging their commanders ? Where are the defections, the bombings of Hamas arms depots, the assassinations from within? Silence can mean fear. Or it can mean complicity. Or something in between—Stockholm, survival, or shared ideology. In the U.S., we talk about “civilians” as if the distinction still means something. But with over 400 million privately owned firearms and tens of millions ideologically radicalized online, let’s be honest: If America were ever invaded, “civilians” would become insurgents by nightfall . That’s the world we live in now. There are no neutral NGOs. No unarmed narratives. No protected identities. Only signal and threat. The 20th century gave us the myth of the sacred civilian. The 21st gave us livestreams, hashtags, and high-velocity optics. And in that world, no medic, no press, no mercy. You are what your feed says you are.…
American Foreign Policy: In Search of Monsters to Destroy How meme warfare, judicial chokeholds, and moral exhaustion paved a runway straight to Tehran Donald Trump is not a shadow lurking at the edge of American democracy. He is the state. The 47th President. Elected—again—not by coup, but through ballots and blood sport. And when, in June 2025, he greenlit the B-2s to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, it wasn’t rogue adventurism. It was the inevitable outcome of a trapped presidency turned outward. The playbook wasn’t new—it just had fewer euphemisms. Blocked by courts from implementing mass deportations. Undermined on tariffs. Cornered by a judiciary that suddenly found its love for process. Trump did what presidents do when the domestic war is off-limits: he started a foreign one. Not to spread democracy. Not to “liberate.” But to remind the world—and his base—that he still had power left to swing. This wasn’t wag-the-dog. This was spite war —military action not to achieve policy but to avenge paralysis. And somehow, this wasn’t un-American. It was peak American. Because the U.S. has long preferred demolition to diplomacy. Our legacy abroad reads like a wrecking report: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria. Humanitarian imperialism, cloaked in moral language, leaving behind what one might call “rubbleization”—the systematic breaking of functioning (if flawed) regimes into privatized chaos. Call it Operation Regime Collapse. Call it the Soft Power Empire. Call it empire-in-denial. Trump, to his credit, dropped the pretense. No blue helmets. No brochures. Just leverage, bombs, and a handshake if you’re an ally who doesn’t whine. Israel, of course, remains the sacred cow in this arrangement. To neocons, evangelicals, and nationalists alike, Israel isn’t just a strategic partner—it’s the last Western nation that still plays by the old rules: borders, bullets, and unapologetic strength. While America frets over DEI briefings, Israel fights. It doesn’t explain itself. And in the American imagination—shaped by thrillers, spy films, and blue fairy godmother Mossad agents—that means something . So when Trump backed Israel—or bombed on its behalf—he wasn’t betraying MAGA’s isolationist streak. He was affirming its logic . America First doesn’t mean America Alone . It means loyalty over liberalism, alliances over apologies, and competence over consensus. Back home, the contradictions multiply. The Right cosplays rebellion while running the government. The Left stages resistance through algorithms, NGOs, and the alphabet soup of federal power. Both claim to be the Rebel Alliance. Both operate like Death Stars. And meanwhile, the country rots under regime warfare—where lawfare replaces legislation, narrative replaces fact, and elections become the only part of democracy we remember to perform. The empathy engine, too, is out of gas. The “baby gambit” no longer moves the public. We’ve seen too many fake cries, too many staged sobs, too many selective spotlights. Gaza, Ukraine, ICE cages—none of it lands like it used to. Weaponized empathy broke under its own overuse. We are not post-moral. We are post-caring. Trump thrives here. Not despite scandal—but because of it. He eats shame for breakfast. Mugshots become merch. Indictments become slogans. Ivanka jokes become meme lore. He is not a candidate. He is a meme engine . A “shame-eater king.” The political embodiment of antifragility. He can’t be grokked because he’s not playing the same game. He metabolizes your disgust and turns it into devotion. So when you ask why he bombed Iran, remember: he couldn’t deport. He couldn’t detain. He couldn’t rule the way he wanted. So he did the next best thing: he ruled where no one could stop him. That’s not authoritarianism. That’s Americanism —with the mask ripped off.…
Willkommen auf Player FM!
Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.