Artwork

Inhalt bereitgestellt von Channel 253. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Channel 253 oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!

Let’s Talk About the End of Abortion Rights and Dobbs with Shannon McMinimee (Dobbs, Part 1)(July 5, 2022)

1:02:13
 
Teilen
 

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on October 19, 2024 03:11 (14d ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Manage episode 333881207 series 1950685
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Channel 253. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Channel 253 oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, issued by the US Supreme Court on June 24, 2022, sweeps away 50 years of legal precedent and healthcare protections to decide: “The Constitution does no confer a right to abortion. Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.” (Dobbs, slip opinion, syllabus).

Constitutional law expert Shannon McMinimee joins host Evelyn Lopez to talk through the Dobbs decision, explain why it is such a dramatic and disturbing change in how the courts consider Constitutional issues and personal rights, and discuss what other laws could face similar fates.

This cases changes everything about how we teach and understand the rule of law and the role of courts. As stated by Joanne Rosen of the Bloomberg School of Public Health: “What is extraordinary in this case is that, perhaps for the first time, the Supreme Court departed from precedent not to recognize a right it had previously neglected but rather to remove one it had previously protected. It deconstitutionalized a long standing right. This is an astonishing moment and an astonishing use of the court’s authority.” (Inside the ‘Dobbs’ decision | Hub (jhu.edu) )

Reading:

See also Dobbs Part 2 with Senator Yasmin Trudeau where we focus on Washington state abortion laws and plans to make them stronger.

If you have questions or comments, please get in touch!

Evelyn Lopez truetacoma@gmail.com @True_Tacoma

Shannon McMinimee shannon@mcminimeelaw.com @SMMcMinimee

  continue reading

126 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on October 19, 2024 03:11 (14d ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Manage episode 333881207 series 1950685
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Channel 253. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Channel 253 oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, issued by the US Supreme Court on June 24, 2022, sweeps away 50 years of legal precedent and healthcare protections to decide: “The Constitution does no confer a right to abortion. Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.” (Dobbs, slip opinion, syllabus).

Constitutional law expert Shannon McMinimee joins host Evelyn Lopez to talk through the Dobbs decision, explain why it is such a dramatic and disturbing change in how the courts consider Constitutional issues and personal rights, and discuss what other laws could face similar fates.

This cases changes everything about how we teach and understand the rule of law and the role of courts. As stated by Joanne Rosen of the Bloomberg School of Public Health: “What is extraordinary in this case is that, perhaps for the first time, the Supreme Court departed from precedent not to recognize a right it had previously neglected but rather to remove one it had previously protected. It deconstitutionalized a long standing right. This is an astonishing moment and an astonishing use of the court’s authority.” (Inside the ‘Dobbs’ decision | Hub (jhu.edu) )

Reading:

See also Dobbs Part 2 with Senator Yasmin Trudeau where we focus on Washington state abortion laws and plans to make them stronger.

If you have questions or comments, please get in touch!

Evelyn Lopez truetacoma@gmail.com @True_Tacoma

Shannon McMinimee shannon@mcminimeelaw.com @SMMcMinimee

  continue reading

126 Episoden

Tous les épisodes

×
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

Kurzanleitung