Artwork

Inhalt bereitgestellt von Hans Demeyer. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Hans Demeyer oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!

Inside the brains of Harris and Trump

33:19
 
Teilen
 

Manage episode 448456413 series 3459183
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Hans Demeyer. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Hans Demeyer oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Shownotes Podcast Episode: Thinking Styles and Meta-Programs

This episode is about thinking styles and meta-programs, and how these influence our behavior and reactions. We will discuss examples of how different thinking styles lead to different reactions in the same situation.

Central themes: What are thinking styles and meta-programs? * Thinking styles and meta-programs are filters that determine how we perceive and react to the world around us. * They influence our communication, collaboration, decision-making and more. Examples of thinking styles and meta-programs:** * Reflective vs. Reactive: Reflective people take the time to think, while reactive people react immediately. * Solution-oriented vs. Problem-oriented: Solution-oriented people focus on solutions, while problem-oriented people focus on the problems themselves. * Global vs. Detail: Global thinkers see the big picture, detail-oriented people focus on the details. * Towards vs. Away From: “Towards” motivated people are driven by goals, “away from” motivated people by avoiding problems. * Internal vs. External frame of reference: People with an internal frame of reference rely on their own judgment, people with an external frame of reference seek confirmation from others. How different thinking styles lead to different reactions:** * Scenario: Partner complains about lack of help in the store. * Reflective, solution-oriented reaction: Listen, show empathy, discuss options. * Dominant, power-oriented reaction: Get angry, blame the store, threaten action. * Scenario: Partner finds compromising messages on phone. * Defensive, attacking reaction: Deny, shift blame, threaten. * (Possible alternative reaction, not in sources): Remain calm, communicate openly and honestly, take responsibility.

  • Applications of knowledge about thinking styles:
    • More effective communication.
    • Better collaboration.
    • Personal development.
    • Coaching and guidance.
  • Tips for using knowledge about thinking styles:
    • Meta-programs are contextual.
    • No one is 100% one type.
    • Use them as a tool, not a label.

Additional points to consider:

  • How can we recognize our own thinking style?
  • How can we adapt to the thinking styles of others?
  • What are the benefits of understanding thinking styles?

The sources do not offer specific information on how to recognize your own thinking style. There may be online tests or questionnaires available that can help with this.

visit www.thehouseofcoaching.com and learn all about skills to bring out the best in yourself and in other people

  continue reading

19 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 
Manage episode 448456413 series 3459183
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Hans Demeyer. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Hans Demeyer oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Shownotes Podcast Episode: Thinking Styles and Meta-Programs

This episode is about thinking styles and meta-programs, and how these influence our behavior and reactions. We will discuss examples of how different thinking styles lead to different reactions in the same situation.

Central themes: What are thinking styles and meta-programs? * Thinking styles and meta-programs are filters that determine how we perceive and react to the world around us. * They influence our communication, collaboration, decision-making and more. Examples of thinking styles and meta-programs:** * Reflective vs. Reactive: Reflective people take the time to think, while reactive people react immediately. * Solution-oriented vs. Problem-oriented: Solution-oriented people focus on solutions, while problem-oriented people focus on the problems themselves. * Global vs. Detail: Global thinkers see the big picture, detail-oriented people focus on the details. * Towards vs. Away From: “Towards” motivated people are driven by goals, “away from” motivated people by avoiding problems. * Internal vs. External frame of reference: People with an internal frame of reference rely on their own judgment, people with an external frame of reference seek confirmation from others. How different thinking styles lead to different reactions:** * Scenario: Partner complains about lack of help in the store. * Reflective, solution-oriented reaction: Listen, show empathy, discuss options. * Dominant, power-oriented reaction: Get angry, blame the store, threaten action. * Scenario: Partner finds compromising messages on phone. * Defensive, attacking reaction: Deny, shift blame, threaten. * (Possible alternative reaction, not in sources): Remain calm, communicate openly and honestly, take responsibility.

  • Applications of knowledge about thinking styles:
    • More effective communication.
    • Better collaboration.
    • Personal development.
    • Coaching and guidance.
  • Tips for using knowledge about thinking styles:
    • Meta-programs are contextual.
    • No one is 100% one type.
    • Use them as a tool, not a label.

Additional points to consider:

  • How can we recognize our own thinking style?
  • How can we adapt to the thinking styles of others?
  • What are the benefits of understanding thinking styles?

The sources do not offer specific information on how to recognize your own thinking style. There may be online tests or questionnaires available that can help with this.

visit www.thehouseofcoaching.com and learn all about skills to bring out the best in yourself and in other people

  continue reading

19 Episoden

Alla avsnitt

×
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

Kurzanleitung