Artwork

Inhalt bereitgestellt von Riva Stoudt. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Riva Stoudt oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!

Ep 3.4 - Therapy in the Shaky Landscape of Contemporary Neuroscience

26:09
 
Teilen
 

Manage episode 419563886 series 3330376
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Riva Stoudt. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Riva Stoudt oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

The Kiln School – Application for Comprehensive Supervision and Training Program


As humans, we tend to like answers a lot more than we like questions. When we believe we have found answers, re-examining what we think of as truth is inherently destabilizing.

In a relatively young field like neuroscience, paradigm shifts, misconceptions, corrections, retractions, and foundational remodels are inevitable. We already have more questions than answers, and each answer spawns a thousand more questions.

That ever-unfolding feedback loop of curiosity, seeking, and finding is beautiful. However, it also causes problems when the paradigms we’ve adopted as true turn out to be mistaken.

Do we throw out therapeutic interventions that work because the neuroscientific explanation becomes irrelevant or outdated? Or do we twist the evidence to make it fit to keep using these interventions? The former seems wasteful, the latter disingenuous.

So what do we do?

It's a daunting task, but acknowledging the vastness of what we don’t know or understand with certainty is a crucial step. This honesty and humility might just be the key to becoming better therapists.

Listen to the full episode to hear:

  • The high stakes of re-examining accepted paradigms for ourselves and our clients
  • Why the therapy field’s longing for legitimacy makes us so prone to cling to neuroscientific concepts
  • Why even rock-solid science probably still won’t erase therapy’s “weird” reputation
  • Why it’s worth asking ourselves how we would explain what we do if we couldn’t rely on our favored neuroscientific explanation
  • How over-adherence to neuroscientific explanations is fueling the toxic intraprofessional culture of therapists
  • Why approaching neuroscientific concepts with humility and a grain of salt and maintaining a healthy skepticism with your clients isn’t going to kill your credibility

Learn more about Riva Stoudt:

  continue reading

37 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 
Manage episode 419563886 series 3330376
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Riva Stoudt. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Riva Stoudt oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

The Kiln School – Application for Comprehensive Supervision and Training Program


As humans, we tend to like answers a lot more than we like questions. When we believe we have found answers, re-examining what we think of as truth is inherently destabilizing.

In a relatively young field like neuroscience, paradigm shifts, misconceptions, corrections, retractions, and foundational remodels are inevitable. We already have more questions than answers, and each answer spawns a thousand more questions.

That ever-unfolding feedback loop of curiosity, seeking, and finding is beautiful. However, it also causes problems when the paradigms we’ve adopted as true turn out to be mistaken.

Do we throw out therapeutic interventions that work because the neuroscientific explanation becomes irrelevant or outdated? Or do we twist the evidence to make it fit to keep using these interventions? The former seems wasteful, the latter disingenuous.

So what do we do?

It's a daunting task, but acknowledging the vastness of what we don’t know or understand with certainty is a crucial step. This honesty and humility might just be the key to becoming better therapists.

Listen to the full episode to hear:

  • The high stakes of re-examining accepted paradigms for ourselves and our clients
  • Why the therapy field’s longing for legitimacy makes us so prone to cling to neuroscientific concepts
  • Why even rock-solid science probably still won’t erase therapy’s “weird” reputation
  • Why it’s worth asking ourselves how we would explain what we do if we couldn’t rely on our favored neuroscientific explanation
  • How over-adherence to neuroscientific explanations is fueling the toxic intraprofessional culture of therapists
  • Why approaching neuroscientific concepts with humility and a grain of salt and maintaining a healthy skepticism with your clients isn’t going to kill your credibility

Learn more about Riva Stoudt:

  continue reading

37 Episoden

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

Kurzanleitung