The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up) podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

36 subscribers

Vor vier Jahren hinzugefügt

Inhalt bereitgestellt von Niall Boylan. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Niall Boylan oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.

Silver Linings with The Old Gays

1
Our Chosen Family: "The gay community is much bolder today." 33:19

vor 17 Tagen33:19

Später Spielen

Listen

Gefällt mir

Geliked

33:19

What’s the secret to lasting friendships? How does queer community show up through the ebbs and flows of life? And what’s the REAL story behind the “YMCA” song? In the first episode of Silver Linings, The Old Gays dive into an essential part of queer life: chosen family. They discuss the vital love, support, and sense of belonging that community provides, especially during life's toughest moments. They open up about what “queer” means to them, how chosen family has impacted their lives, and how to maintain close bonds over time–including their love for each other! “We’ve come a long way, baby.” Family isn’t just what you’re born with; it’s the people who show up, shape you, and stick around. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.…

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Serie-Home•Feed

Niall Boylan is online, and nobody can hold him back. Subscribe to The Niall Boylan Show and access premium content by visiting https://niallboylan.com

589 Episoden

#Society #Niall Boylan #Ireland #Thought Provoking

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

36 subscribers

updated vor 17 Stunden

Serie-Home•Feed

Niall Boylan is online, and nobody can hold him back. Subscribe to The Niall Boylan Show and access premium content by visiting https://niallboylan.com

589 Episoden

#Society #Niall Boylan #Ireland #Thought Provoking

Alle Folgen

1
#410 Bank vs. Family: The Final Notice 1:35:25

vor 17 hours1:35:25

1:35:25

In this episode, Niall takes on a deeply personal and divisive question: Should families lose their homes if they can’t keep up with payments? Dolores, a listener, wrote in with a story that resonates with many. She and her husband bought their house twelve years ago, determined to give their children a secure place to grow up. But after the pandemic cost her husband his job, they fell behind. Despite his return to work and her efforts to make ends meet, they can’t catch up on the mortgage. Now, a letter from the bank threatens to take away the only home their kids have ever known. Dolores wonders if it’s fair that a family like hers could lose everything because of a crisis they didn’t cause. She sees how the bank has its own financial obligations, but she also believes there has to be a better way to help people in real need. Some callers argue that the bank’s job is to protect its investments. They say it’s not about cruelty; it’s about economic survival. Repossessions, they argue, keep the system from collapsing and ensure that those who can’t pay don’t put everyone else at risk. Others say that’s exactly the problem: the system cares more about numbers than people. They argue that banks and governments should find ways to keep families like Dolores’ in their homes—because losing a home doesn’t just hurt one family, it scars a whole community. As the episode unfolds, Niall weighs these opposing views and leaves listeners with a question: What kind of society do we want to be—one that sees homes as assets to protect, or as havens for families to keep?…

1
#409 The Power of Silence: When Men Are Abused 1:40:14

vor 1 day1:40:14

1:40:14

In this episode, Niall asks: Are men equally the victims of domestic violence? The conversation challenges the long-held belief that domestic abuse is solely a women’s issue and looks at the stigma that stops men from speaking out. Some callers said men absolutely can be victims — and too often their pain is laughed off or ignored. They argued that if a man hits a woman, it’s instantly condemned, but when it’s the other way around, there’s a double standard. One caller shared how men are told to ‘man up’ instead of being allowed to ask for help. Others felt that while men might experience some violence, it’s not the same as what women face. They argued that domestic violence against women is still a far more serious and pervasive issue, and focusing on men’s experiences could distract from the broader crisis. Niall reflected that while domestic violence is complex and often hidden, no victim’s voice should be dismissed — and understanding the full picture is the only way to find real solutions.…

1
#408 Would you snitch on a co-worker if you caught them stealing? 1:20:46

vor 3 Tagen1:20:46

1:20:46

In this episode, Niall asks: What should you do if a co-worker you caught stealing promises to stop — but then you catch them again? The topic comes from an email by a man who saw a colleague slipping store clothes into her bag. She told him she was struggling to pay bills and needed to make ends meet. Out of compassion, he agreed not to tell management if she promised to stop. But now, he’s caught her again — and he doesn’t know if he should keep quiet a second time. Some callers said he had to report her. They felt that once you give someone a chance and they break that trust, you have no choice. Others argued that turning a blind eye only enables more theft and puts everyone else’s jobs at risk. Others understood why he hesitated. They said it’s not black and white — maybe she really is desperate, and reporting her could cost her everything. But even then, they admitted it’s tough to keep covering for someone who isn’t stopping. Niall reflected that these situations test not just your loyalty to a colleague, but your own boundaries and conscience — and sometimes, the line between helping and enabling isn’t as clear as you’d hope. Date: 27/05/2025…

1
#407 The Immigration Crisis: Is a Full Stop the Answer? 1:46:56

vor 8 Tagen1:46:56

1:46:56

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland place a total pause on immigration until we fix the issues at home? While many agree that illegal immigration needs stronger enforcement, a growing number of voices are now calling for a complete halt to all immigration — legal or not — until the country gets its housing, healthcare, and infrastructure crises under control. Some callers supported a full stop. They argued that Ireland is already stretched to breaking point, with hospitals under pressure, families unable to find housing, and social services overwhelmed. In their view, the country needs to prioritise its own citizens before bringing in more people. Others pushed back, saying an outright pause would be un-Irish and ultimately self-defeating. They acknowledged the strain on the system but insisted that shutting the door completely would damage the economy and contradict Ireland’s values. Some stressed that immigration isn’t the core problem — poor planning and mismanagement are. Niall reflected that while frustration is real and growing, the solution may not lie in absolutes — but in whether we can fix what’s broken without turning away from what defines us.…

1
#406 Dad’s Dirty Secret: Would You Tell? 1:03:58

vor 9 Tagen1:03:58

1:03:58

In this episode, Niall asks: If you found out your father was cheating on your mother, would you tell her? The question comes from a young woman who emailed the show after catching her dad having an affair — and now she’s torn between protecting her mother and protecting her relationship with her father. Some callers said she absolutely needs to tell her mother. They argued that staying silent makes her complicit, and that honesty is the only way to prevent deeper betrayal. One shared their own experience of exposing a cheating father, saying it was painful but necessary. Others felt it wasn’t her place to get involved. They said the daughter shouldn’t be put in the middle of her parents’ marriage and warned that revealing the affair could cause more damage than it fixes. One caller pointed out that people make mistakes, and rushing to expose it might destroy what’s left of the family. Niall reflected that trust, loyalty, and truth don’t always point in the same direction — and sometimes, the hardest choices are the ones with no clear right answer.…

1
#405 Too Young to Drink, Old Enough to Vote? 1:28:49

vor 10 Tagen1:28:49

1:28:49

In this episode, Niall asks whether 16-year-olds should be allowed to vote. The Social Democrats are set to table a bill to lower Ireland’s voting age from 18 to 16 — but is that too young to make informed political decisions? Are today’s teenagers engaged enough to help shape the future of the country, or are they being used as political pawns? Some callers argue that if 16-year-olds can work, pay taxes, and drive mopeds, they deserve a say in shaping policies that will affect them for decades — especially when it comes to climate, housing, and education. Others disagree, saying teenagers are still developing emotionally and intellectually, and shouldn't be handed responsibility over national decision-making. Some feel the proposal is less about civic empowerment and more about political strategy. As the lines light up, the debate gets heated, with strong views on both sides about maturity, responsibility, and what it really means to be ready to vote.…

1
#404 Are Men and Women Truly Treated Equally in Society? 1:39:43

vor 11 Tagen1:39:43

1:39:43

In this episode, Niall asks a hard question that many are afraid to voice: Are men and women truly treated equally in modern society? The discussion is sparked by an email from a male listener who says he was passed over for a management promotion in favour of a woman, despite having more experience and being told he was next in line. According to a friend in HR, the decision came down to gender — his company already had two male managers, and they "needed a woman" to balance the optics. The email raises deep questions about gender quotas, meritocracy, and whether attempts to correct historical imbalances are now causing new forms of discrimination. Some callers believe we are finally seeing long-overdue progress. They argue that women have spent decades fighting for space in male-dominated fields and that occasionally favouring a female candidate is part of addressing past injustice. For them, it’s not about ignoring merit, but correcting systemic imbalance. Other callers strongly disagree, saying equality should never come at the expense of fairness. They feel gender quotas are increasingly being used to justify hiring decisions that overlook the most qualified person — and that this silent shift is leaving many men feeling sidelined and voiceless.…

1
Unsupervised Learners: A Shortcut to Danger? Episode 403 1:27:55

vor 15 Tagen1:27:55

1:27:55

In this episode, Niall asks: Should learner drivers be allowed to drive unaccompanied? The debate heats up after Fianna Fáil TD Cathal Crowe suggested that current rules — which require learners to be accompanied by a fully licensed driver — are too restrictive, especially for students and young people living in rural areas. Supporters of relaxing the law say it’s a practical move. In rural Ireland, public transport is limited, and many young people are left stranded or dependent on others for the simplest tasks — from getting to work, to attending college, or even visiting the GP. They argue that responsible learner drivers, especially those with some experience or awaiting a delayed test, should be trusted to drive alone under certain conditions. On the other hand, critics warn that relaxing the law could be dangerous. They argue that L-plate drivers lack the experience and judgment to drive solo, and the current system exists for a reason — to protect everyone on the road. Some callers highlight the increase in road deaths and say safety should come before convenience. If learners want independence, they say, they should wait until they pass the test. This episode weighs freedom against responsibility and rural need against national safety. Where do you stand?…

1
Do you regret having children? Episode 402 1:22:30

vor 16 Tagen1:22:30

1:22:30

In this episode, Niall explores a deeply taboo question: Do people ever regret having children? It's a topic most parents are too ashamed or afraid to speak about publicly—but for some, the feeling is real. The conversation begins with an email from a listener who admits they love their children but quietly wonder what life might’ve looked like without them. The exhaustion, financial strain, loss of freedom, and relationship breakdowns have left them questioning whether parenthood was the right path. Callers respond with brutal honesty. Some say it's a thought they've had late at night when the pressure becomes too much. They talk about how parenthood isn’t always the joyful, fulfilling journey it’s made out to be—especially when support is lacking or when it comes at the cost of identity and dreams. Others are outraged by the very idea, calling it selfish or ungrateful. To them, children are a blessing, not a burden, and regret is a luxury some can't afford to entertain. They believe that even in hard times, the love and purpose parenting brings outweighs any fleeting doubts. This episode pulls no punches. It's raw, emotional, and brutally honest—shining a light on one of the last parenting taboos. Date: 14/05/2025…

1
Would You Pay Illegal Migrants to Leave? Episode 401 1:24:02

vor 17 Tagen1:24:02

1:24:02

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland pay illegal migrants to leave the country? The discussion comes after Donald Trump announced plans to offer flights to help undocumented migrants “self-deport,” warning that those who refuse would face the full force of the law. Should Ireland consider a similar approach—offering cash incentives for voluntary departure—or stick to straightforward deportation? Callers were split. Some argued that offering a one-time payment could save taxpayers money in the long run by avoiding lengthy legal battles, appeals, and costly accommodation. They said it allows people to leave with dignity while relieving pressure on housing and public services. Others were furious at the idea of rewarding illegal behaviour, insisting it would send the wrong message and attract more people hoping for a payout. “Break the law and get paid for it? That’s madness,” one caller said. The debate touches on national priorities, border control, and the ethics of migration enforcement. Should compassion guide policy—or common sense? Date: 13/05/25…

1
The Breast Is Yet to Come: Embracing Public Feeding Episode 400 1:27:18

vor 22 Tagen1:27:18

1:27:18

In this episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, we’re asking: Should mothers be free to breastfeed anywhere they choose—or should there be limits? The conversation stems from a viral post showing a mother breastfeeding her baby in public with the caption challenging people to stop demanding mothers be “respectful” while feeding their child. While breastfeeding is legal in public across many countries, including Ireland, mothers still face social stigma, judgmental stares, and even harassment for doing something as natural and necessary as feeding a baby. Niall invites listeners to weigh in on whether society should normalize public breastfeeding or if discretion is still necessary in certain settings. Some callers felt mothers should be able to breastfeed absolutely anywhere, without shame or pressure to hide. They argued that feeding a baby is a human right, not a display of indecency—and that people who are uncomfortable need to grow up and mind their own business. Others felt there should be some boundaries. While supportive of breastfeeding, they said it should be done with “consideration,” like using a nursing cover or opting for private spaces when possible. For them, it’s about respect for others in shared public areas, not denying a baby its needs.…

1
Dr. Marcus de Brun: The Level of Incompetence Could Only Be Described as Manslaughter 52:46

vor 23 Tagen52:46

52:46

Dr. Marcus de Brun joins Niall Boylan to expose what he calls a dark chapter in Ireland’s COVID-19 response—one marked by censorship, coercion, and what he describes as “manslaughter in slow motion.” A former GP and former member of the Irish Medical Council, de Brun now faces the possible loss of his medical licence. “I’ve been accused of misconduct—not for hurting patients, not for negligence—but for saying things the government didn’t like,” he says. His so-called misconduct? Speaking out—on radio, in articles, and at protests—against what he saw as reckless and unethical pandemic policies. He paints a damning picture: hospital patients, untested, were transferred into nursing homes; diagnostic testing was pulled; GPs were told not just to follow guidelines, but to promote them. “You want to know how to conduct a mass killing of vulnerable people?” he asks. “Start by cutting off diagnostics and dump untested patients where they’re weakest.” De Brun says he initially complied with the vaccination programme for the most vulnerable, but he drew a firm line when it came to children. “Over 70,000 cases in children, and not one single fatality. And yet they told me if I didn’t inject children, I’d be suspended. That’s not science—that’s tyranny.” He explains the mechanism of the mRNA vaccine in sobering terms: “This isn’t a vaccine. It’s a piece of genetic code wrapped in fat that hijacks your cells. There’s no dosage control. No off switch. Any cell in your body can take it up—and start producing spike protein.” What’s more alarming, he says, is that this technology isn’t just new—it’s a game changer for Big Pharma. “If a drug company like Pfizer can get your body to produce the drug inside you, they don’t need factories. They don’t need staff. You become the factory. And there’s no product control, because the process is happening in you—not in a lab.” He warns that this opens a dangerous frontier in medicine. “What they’re playing with—human genetics—is highly dangerous and should be stopped. These vaccines should be completely withdrawn.” And why were doctors barred from trying alternative treatments? His answer is blunt: “The vaccine needed emergency use approval. And under that system, there can’t be any alternative treatments. That’s why we were gagged. And the Medical Council became the enforcer.” He adds: “The only explanation I can come up with is the influence of large conglomerates or corporations. That’s why the general public were denied access to potential treatments. And the level of incompetence in the nursing homes… could only be described as manslaughter.” De Brun says he’s not alone. At least a dozen other GPs are under investigation for similar “offences,” including one struck off for refusing to administer the vaccine and another disciplined for simply putting up a poster in his waiting room advising caution. “None of us harmed a patient,” he says. “Our mistake was speaking.” He believes the Irish media helped suppress dissent. “RTE never called again. They took the state’s money and became mouthpieces. People weren’t informed—they were manipulated.” And the contradiction? “92% of healthcare workers didn’t even take the booster last year,” he says. “But they’re still giving it to nursing home residents—many of whom can’t consent. What kind of ethics is that?” As Niall recalls being labelled “anti-lockdown” in a government-funded report, Dr. de Brun reflects on what this was really about. “It was never about public health. It was about control. About power. And now they want us to forget.” When asked whether it was worth it—after losing his practice, facing investigation, and enduring years of silence and depression—he answers plainly: “Ask me after June. If they take my license, they’ll take my livelihood. But they won’t take what I know to be true.” This is a conversation the system hoped you’d never hear—and one that still demands answers.…

1
#399 How Much Do You Make? Soon Everyone Will Know 1:27:35

vor 24 Tagen1:27:35

1:27:35

In this episode, Niall asks: Would knowing your co-worker’s salary make the workplace fairer – or just more toxic? The discussion is sparked by the EU’s new directive on pay transparency, which will soon require companies to publish salary ranges for advertised roles and allow employees to request the salary range for their own positions. This move, aimed at reducing the gender pay gap and promoting fairness, is set to challenge one of Ireland’s last taboos: openly discussing pay. Under the directive, employers will also be banned from asking candidates about their pay history—an effort to prevent lowball offers and empower jobseekers. While many praise the transparency as a step toward equality and negotiating power, critics argue it could lead to resentment, tension, and unnecessary workplace drama. Callers were split on the issue. Some welcomed the change, saying salary secrecy allows inequality to flourish unchecked. They argued that transparency would empower employees—especially women and younger workers—and ensure people are being paid fairly for the same work. Others warned that revealing salaries would sow division, resentment, and jealousy in the workplace. They felt that pay often reflects experience, skills, or negotiation—not just job title—and feared salary comparisons could fuel bitterness instead of cooperation. Niall concluded by acknowledging the deeply personal nature of salary discussions in Ireland, but noted that greater transparency is now inevitable. Whether it leads to a fairer workplace—or a more fractured one—remains to be seen.…

1
#398 Pointless Protests: Is the Government Listening? 1:36:15

vor 29 Tagen1:36:15

1:36:15

In this episode, Niall asks: Do protests still have the power to make a difference—or are they being ignored? The discussion follows last weekend’s enormous demonstration in Dublin, where tens of thousands flooded O’Connell Street in a grassroots protest against Ireland’s immigration policy. Despite the protest's size, it received minimal media attention and no formal response from the government, leading many to question whether public demonstrations can still force change. Unlike the usual state-funded rallies or trade union-backed marches, this protest had no political party or media machine behind it—just ordinary people voicing their frustration. The demonstration was framed as a tribute to the 1916 Easter Rising, with protesters marching in memory of those who gave their lives for Irish freedom. But for many, it also served as a sharp critique of modern Ireland’s direction—highlighting issues like mass immigration, housing shortages, rising cost of living, and what many see as a government out of touch with its people. Some callers felt the protest marked a turning point, showing that public anger is growing and that change could be coming, even if not immediately. They believe such mass mobilisation is essential to send a message to the government and inspire more people to speak out. Others weren’t so sure. They argued that without political organisation or action at the ballot box, protests alone won’t make a difference. While powerful in spirit, they fear these events are easily dismissed by those in power unless voters follow through with change at the polls.…

1
#397 Three Bedrooms, One Pensioner: Fair or Selfish? 1:50:52

vor 30 Tagen1:50:52

1:50:52

In this episode, Niall asks: Should older people living alone in three-bedroom council houses be required to downsize to make way for younger families? As Ireland’s housing crisis deepens, the question of how social housing is allocated has sparked a new debate. With growing numbers of families stuck in emergency accommodation and a severe shortage of larger homes, is it reasonable to ask elderly tenants to move into smaller properties when their housing needs have changed? Or is it unfair to expect someone to leave the home they’ve lived in for decades? Some callers think it’s a necessary step in managing scarce resources. Council housing should be based on need, not comfort. If someone is occupying a home that no longer fits their situation, it’s only fair to make room for families who desperately need space. The state should provide incentives or suitable alternatives like one-bedroom bungalows or retirement communities to support the move. While other callers feel it’s cruel and disrespectful to push older people out of the homes they’ve built their lives in. Many have lived there for decades, raised families, and maintained their communities. Forcing them out now feels like a punishment. Moreover, the lack of appropriate downsized housing makes this idea unrealistic and unjust.…

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

Höre 500+ Themen zu

36 subscribers

Ähnelt The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Podcasts, die es wert sind, gehört zu werden

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Podcasts, die es wert sind, gehört zu werden

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Ähnelt The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Kurzanleitung