Artwork

Inhalt bereitgestellt von Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and The University of Queensland. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and The University of Queensland oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!

Andrew McKenzie-McHarg on Conspiracy Theory: The Shadow History of Social Science

1:28:17
 
Teilen
 

Manage episode 288631299 series 2902452
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and The University of Queensland. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and The University of Queensland oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
In recent times, “conspiracy theory” has become a buzzword. Its rise to prominence reflects a political climate charged with partisanship and unsettled by changes in media technology. The phenomenon itself is, however, much older. One crucial difference between the contemporary situation and earlier times lies in the former absence of the term: the conceptual means to flag down conspiracy theories only emerged in the twentieth century. But how exactly were liberal democracies sensitized to the presence of this phenomenon that so offends their notions of authoritative knowledge and flouts their rules of evidence-based argumentation? And what kinds of problems have arisen, now that “conspiracy theory” has advanced to the main conceptual “handle” with which we try to come to grips with this phenomenon? This lecture will demonstrate that much of the answer to these questions is tied up with the emergence of social science. From its earliest days, social science was haunted by the spectre of conspiracy theory. Numerous means were devised to banish it or at least to hold it at bay, and first and foremost among them was assigning it a name. Andrew McKenzie-McHarg is a senior research fellow at the Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry at the Australian Catholic University (ACU). He wrote his PhD at the University of Erfurt in Germany and subsequently was involved in the Conspiracy and Democracy Project at the University of Cambridge. His research extends from anti-Jesuit polemics in the early modern period to the emergence of the social sciences in more modern times.
  continue reading

2 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 
Manage episode 288631299 series 2902452
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and The University of Queensland. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and The University of Queensland oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
In recent times, “conspiracy theory” has become a buzzword. Its rise to prominence reflects a political climate charged with partisanship and unsettled by changes in media technology. The phenomenon itself is, however, much older. One crucial difference between the contemporary situation and earlier times lies in the former absence of the term: the conceptual means to flag down conspiracy theories only emerged in the twentieth century. But how exactly were liberal democracies sensitized to the presence of this phenomenon that so offends their notions of authoritative knowledge and flouts their rules of evidence-based argumentation? And what kinds of problems have arisen, now that “conspiracy theory” has advanced to the main conceptual “handle” with which we try to come to grips with this phenomenon? This lecture will demonstrate that much of the answer to these questions is tied up with the emergence of social science. From its earliest days, social science was haunted by the spectre of conspiracy theory. Numerous means were devised to banish it or at least to hold it at bay, and first and foremost among them was assigning it a name. Andrew McKenzie-McHarg is a senior research fellow at the Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry at the Australian Catholic University (ACU). He wrote his PhD at the University of Erfurt in Germany and subsequently was involved in the Conspiracy and Democracy Project at the University of Cambridge. His research extends from anti-Jesuit polemics in the early modern period to the emergence of the social sciences in more modern times.
  continue reading

2 Episoden

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

Kurzanleitung