Artwork

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
Checked 22h ago
Vor drei Jahren hinzugefügt
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Mark Treichel and Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Mark Treichel and Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-App
Gehen Sie mit der App Player FM offline!
icon Daily Deals

Credit Union Exam Solutions Presents With Flying Colors

Teilen
 

Manage series 3303439
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Mark Treichel and Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Mark Treichel and Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Tips for Credit Unions Success on the NCUA Examination. Brought to you by Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions.
  continue reading

269 Episoden

Artwork
iconTeilen
 
Manage series 3303439
Inhalt bereitgestellt von Mark Treichel and Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions. Alle Podcast-Inhalte, einschließlich Episoden, Grafiken und Podcast-Beschreibungen, werden direkt von Mark Treichel and Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions oder seinem Podcast-Plattformpartner hochgeladen und bereitgestellt. Wenn Sie glauben, dass jemand Ihr urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk ohne Ihre Erlaubnis nutzt, können Sie dem hier beschriebenen Verfahren folgen https://de.player.fm/legal.
Tips for Credit Unions Success on the NCUA Examination. Brought to you by Mark Treichel's Credit Union Exam Solutions.
  continue reading

269 Episoden

ทุกตอน

×
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ The National Credit Union Administration today placed Aldersgate Federal Credit Union in Marion, Illinois, into conservatorship. Member services will continue while the NCUA works to resolve issues affecting the credit union’s operations. Member deposits at Aldersgate Federal Credit Union remain protected by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund. Administered by the NCUA, the Share Insurance Fund protects individual accounts at federally insured credit unions up to $250,000. Member’s interest in all joint accounts combined is also insured up to $250,000. The Share Insurance Fund separately protects IRA and KEOGH retirement accounts up to $250,000. The Share Insurance Fund has the backing of the full faith and credit of the United States. Members may conduct financial transactions via phone by calling the NCUA Asset Management and Assistance Center at 512.231.7940 Monday through Thursday between 10:00AM-4:00PM Central. Those calls will be routed to the appropriate specialists. Members can continue to conduct financial transactions, such as depositing funds, making loan payments, and requesting share withdrawals during the conservatorship. Members with questions about the conservatorship may review the Aldersgate Federal Credit Union’s frequently asked questions posted on the NCUA’s website. Members with questions about their Share Insurance Fund coverage can find more information in the Share Insurance Coverage (Opens new window) section of NCUA’s MyCreditUnion.gov (Opens new window) consumer website. Aldersgate Federal Credit Union is a federally insured credit union with 811 members and reported assets of $10.6 million, according to the credit union’s most recent Call Report. Aldersgate Federal Credit Union serves the ministerial and probationary members, full time employees, local pastors, clergy persons and diaconal ministers under appointment of the bishop of the Illinois Great Rivers Conference of the United Methodist Church…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ In this short and slightly offbeat solo episode, Mark shares a personal tale of dog sitting gone sideways—with two lovable pit bulls, a well-intentioned checklist, and a humbling C-minus execution grade. But the real story is what the NCUA didn't do last week. The agency quietly canceled its June board meeting and offered only a placeholder for July, continuing a trend that started under Chairman Todd Harper. Mark weighs in on what this says about the agency's direction, leadership, and communication strategy.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Episode Summary: In this episode, I dive into what NCUA might look like after its May 22nd downsizing — a 25% reduction in staff driven by Trump-era mandates for smaller government. Using clues from the agency’s own language, historical precedent, and my firsthand experience with past reorganizations, I lay out my predictions for NCUA’s evolving structure. This is part three of a special podcast series unpacking the agency’s potential realignment. Key Topics Covered: 📉 25% Workforce Reduction : Who’s leaving, and what that signals for the future. 🏛️ Trump’s Mandate for Smaller Agencies : How it shapes NCUA’s staffing and budget decisions. 🗂️ Reading the Tea Leaves from Slide 13 : Consolidation, decentralization, and “high-impact” work. 🔁 Past is Prologue : Lessons from the early 2000s restructuring under Chairman Dennis Dollar. 📊 Who Reports to Whom? : A detailed review of the current org chart and likely changes. ⚖️ Legal Implications : Why some moves (like eliminating ONES) may require board votes or rule changes. 🧩 Likely Office Shifts : OMWI, Ethics, and Board Secretary to new homes Potential absorption or elimination of CURE, ONES, and AMAC Field of Membership functions back to the regions 🔍 High-Value Work Only? : Implications for DEI, affinity groups, and central office roles. 📍 Draconian Possibilities : Could NCUA eventually eliminate regions or relocate HQ? 🧠 Machiavelli & Reorgs : Why changing a system brings both enemies and uncertainty. Quotable Moments: “Reorgs can create the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.” — Quoting Pétain “For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institutions…” — Niccolò Machiavelli Why It Matters: Whether you're a credit union exec, examiner, or industry observer, understanding NCUA's likely future state can help you prepare for changes that could affect regulatory oversight, staffing, and even strategic planning at your institution.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ 📝 Episode Summary: In this post-Memorial Day episode, Mark dives into NCUA’s latest insurance fund update with a sharp focus on CAMEL codes—and why they matter more than ever in today's regulatory landscape. With NCUA facing staffing cuts, hiring freezes, and leadership questions, your credit union's CAMEL rating may determine how much attention (or relief) you're about to get. Mark walks through key takeaways from the data, trends in ratings across credit union size categories, and why being a CAMEL 1 or 2 could lead to fewer exams—while CAMEL 3, 4, and 5 credit unions face a leaner, potentially more stressed NCUA. 🔑 Key Topics Covered: Overview of NCUA's recent briefing and CAMEL code performance Declines in CAMEL 3s, 4s, and 5s—what’s real and what’s merger-driven? Increased risk for complex credit unions ($500M+) Impact of staffing reductions on supervision intensity Why being a CAMEL 1 or 2 may now mean more operational flexibility What Kyle Hauptman said—and didn’t say—about being the only board member Speculation on NCUA’s future organizational structure 📌 Takeaways: CAMEL codes improved overall, but large credit unions saw some deterioration. NCUA’s downsizing and hiring freeze will shift how and when exams occur. Your credit union’s CAMEL code now plays an even bigger role in how much NCUA interacts with you. Good communication and organized documentation are essential if you're a CAMEL 3–5 credit union. The regulatory future may hinge on ongoing lawsuits and Supreme Court decisions about agency power. ⭐ Support the Show: If you enjoyed the episode, please rate us 5 stars and share the podcast with your credit union colleagues. It helps us get the word out!…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Trump’s Workforce Cuts Hit NCUA: What’s Changing, What’s Next Show Notes In this episode of With Flying Colors , Mark Treichel breaks down the biggest NCUA update in years — a Trump-era Executive Order has triggered a 20% voluntary staff reduction at the agency. This May 22 board briefing outlines how the NCUA will operate with fewer people, a tighter budget, and a restructured exam program — all while staying focused on its core mission. 20% Staff Reduction by Year-End NCUA is cutting 250 positions — driven by Executive Order 14210. No Layoffs, All Voluntary Staff could opt for paid leave (NDRP) or a $50K incentive (NVSIP). Program Exceeded Target 297 enrolled; around 250 will actually depart — above the 217 needed. HQ Was Hit Hardest 30% of HQ staff enrolled vs. 20% in the regions — right-sizing in progress. Hiring Freeze Through July 15 Replacements limited to 1 hire for every 4 departures, only in top-priority roles. Realignment Likely Signals point to fewer departments, streamlined reporting, and a leaner structure. Extended Exam Cycles Well-run credit unions get more time between exams — up to 24 months in some cases. $75M in Budget Savings Expected in 2026 Minimal 2025 savings due to admin leave; big gains next year. Agency Admits: 'Less with Less' NCUA is trimming low-value work and asking staff for smarter, simpler workflows. Tech + Targeted Hiring Ahead Come 2026, investments in automation and skilled examiners are planned.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel reconnects with Ryan Donovan, President and CEO of the Council of Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). Ryan returns to discuss the evolving role of the FHLB system, its relationship with credit unions, and how liquidity is much like oxygen—often unnoticed until it's urgently needed. Ryan and Mark explore: The history and mission of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. How FHLB provides daily liquidity to its members and why it's a critical tool—not just in times of crisis. The difference between the FHLB system and the Federal Reserve as liquidity sources. How FHLB and credit unions are "cooperative cousins" working together to strengthen communities. The system's record-breaking $1.2 billion commitment to affordable housing initiatives. Director Bill Pulte's early signals and what his leadership at FHFA could mean for FHLB and the credit union system. Why credit unions, especially smaller ones, should consider joining the FHLB system to strengthen their balance sheets and enhance loan capacity. Ryan also highlights recent research showing that FHLB membership helps credit unions grow faster, remain competitive, and support their members more effectively—all while maintaining safe and sound lending practices. Key Takeaways: FHLB isn’t just a lender of last resort—it’s a daily liquidity partner. Affordable housing remains a priority, with FHLB surpassing its statutory requirements. Credit unions can amplify their impact by leveraging the FHLB system. Regulatory dynamics are shifting, but FHLB's mission remains steady: Keep liquidity flowing to local lenders. Resources Mentioned: Council of Federal Home Loan Banks FHLB & Credit Union Liquidity Research by Filene Research Institute Follow Ryan Donovan on LinkedIn Connect with Mark Treichel: LinkedIn: Mark Treichel Website: Credit Union Exam Solutions…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ This post on LinkedIn led to this podcast: Growing this program from an idea, to an incredible technological platform is far and away the most rewarding venture of my career. The platform has allowed our company to think and dream of bigger ideas. It’s functionally changed the lives of so many of us. To say I’m proud of this achievement is an understatement. A huge kudos to Alloya Corporate FCU for taking a risk on a young kid with some wild ideas and a sincere thank you for the team who made it all possible.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Presidential Power and Independent Agency Autonomy: The 2025 NCUA Board Removal Case I. Legal and Constitutional Framework A Constitutional Showdown Begins From "At Pleasure" to Independence: The 1978 Restructuring The Humphrey's Executor Precedent: Protecting Independent Agencies Unitary Executive vs. Congressional Design The Narrowing Path of Agency Independence Swan v. Clinton: The Precedent That Wasn't Quite 50 Years of Respect for Fixed Terms II. The NCUA's Specific Structure and Functions The Removed Regulators: Harper and Otsuka The NCUA: A Core Financial Regulator Executive Function or Independent Regulation? The NCUSIF: Owned by Credit Unions, Not Government The Central Liquidity Facility: A Link to Treasury Operating Without a Quorum Financial Stability at Stake III. Litigation Strategy and Broader Implications Six Legal Theories for Victory David vs. Goliath: The Legal Team The Long Road to the Supreme Court Beyond NCUA: Implications for the Administrative State…
 
Conservatorship: When NCUA Removes the Board & What You Need to Know Episode Summary: In this special episode, hosts Mark Treichel, Steve Farrar, and Todd Miller dive into the high-stakes world of NCUA conservatorships —when the agency steps in to remove a credit union’s board and take control. Drawing from their extensive experience handling some of the largest conservatorships in NCUA history, they provide insider insights on: What conservatorship means and when it happens The role of the NCUA as both regulator and conservator Why NCUA often opts for conservatorship over cease-and-desist actions The challenges of managing a conservatorship from both a regulator’s and a credit union’s perspective Success stories and lessons learned from past conservatorships The hosts reflect on the intensity, challenges, and rewards of the conservatorship process, including the balance between protecting the NCUSIF (National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund) and serving credit union members. Whether you’re a credit union executive, regulator, or industry observer, this episode delivers valuable insights into one of the NCUA’s most powerful enforcement tools. Key Quotes: 🗣️ “Conservatorships are an adrenaline ride. They can be a challenge, they can be fun, they can be scary—and they can be very effective when they're appropriate.” – Mark Treichel 🗣️ “Most conservatorships come down to people problems—boards and executives that can’t or won’t fix the issues.” – Todd Miller 🗣️ “NCUA has to strike a balance between protecting the insurance fund and doing what’s best for the credit union’s members.” – Steve Farrar Resources & Links: 🔹 Learn more about NCUA conservatorships and credit union exam solutions at MarkTreichel.com 🔹 Subscribe to With Flying Colors on your favorite podcast platform to stay up to date on credit union regulations and best practices. 🎧 Don’t miss this deep dive into one of the most extreme actions NCUA can take—hit play now!…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ The NCUA’s boardroom has been rocked. Two board members fired. DOGE staff roaming the halls. Rumors of a regulatory consolidation swirl. In this must-hear episode, Mark Treichel is joined by former NCUA Board Member Geoff Bacino and former NCUA Congressional Affairs Director John McKechnie to unpack one of the most chaotic weeks in recent credit union regulatory history. From unprecedented dismissals to the looming question of NCUA’s independence, we cover: 🔥 The removal of Todd Harper and Tanya Otsuka: What happened, what’s legal, and what’s next 🛡️ What the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) visit to NCUA signals 🧨 Are we headed for a consolidation of financial regulators? 🏛️ The forgotten Supreme Court case that may decide the future of independent agencies 📉 Why up to 20% of NCUA staff may exit — and what that means for credit union supervision 🧠 Institutional memory, directed reassignments, and the “brain drain” risk 💡 Predictions on new board nominations, and what credit unions should watch for next Whether you’re a credit union executive, examiner, or policy junkie, this is your front-row seat to the unfolding transformation at 1775 Duke Street.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the firings, saying, “President Trump is the chief executive of the executive branch and reserves the right to fire anyone he wants.” Warren: “President Trump just fired two Board Members at the National Credit Union Administration in his continued attack on American consumers. This is the latest attempt by Trump to skirt the rule of law, undermine independent agencies, and illegally purge the government of those who work for the American people.”…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Episode Overview: In this episode of With Flying Colors , Mark Treichel tackles two hot topics ahead of the upcoming NCUA Board meeting: The Staff Buyout Program : With 145 FTEs already accepting voluntary separation packages—roughly 12% of NCUA's workforce—Mark explores the deeper implications. Could the agency be targeting a symbolic sub-1,000 FTE threshold? Poll results and inside intel help paint the picture. The Wildfire Relief Briefing : Mark offers context for why the interagency appraisal relief rule—issued in January—is now being briefed to the NCUA Board in April. Plus, a timely listener tip leads to a discussion of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant’s recent remarks about reshaping regulatory culture—calling for more transparency, better tailored supervision, and a possible redefinition of "safety and soundness." 📊 Topics Covered: C. Northcote Parkinson’s quote on vacuums and rumors Triangulating NCUA’s staff reduction targets Poll insights: 90% of listeners prioritize the buyout news Board dynamics and scripted briefings—what to listen for Thursday Treasury’s evolving role in banking regulation under Bessant Why defining “unsafe and unsound” could transform CU oversight 🗣️ Listener Tip of the Week: A sharp-eyed listener flagged Bessant’s speech, opening the door to a broader discussion on Main Street vs. Wall Street priorities and the future of regulatory supervision. 🎧 Listen to learn: What NCUA might really be signaling with its buyout program How upcoming briefings may reveal internal Board dynamics Why new rhetoric from Treasury could matter for credit unions…
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel is joined by former NCUA capital markets expert Todd Miller to discuss the latest updates to NCUA’s Interest Rate Risk (IRR) Supervisory Framework. Following NCUA’s recent stakeholder webinar, we break down key takeaways, including changes to risk categorization, the elimination of the extreme risk rating, and how these updates impact credit unions navigating today’s economic landscape. What You’ll Learn in This Episode: ✅ The history and evolution of NCUA’s NEV framework ✅ Why NCUA eliminated the “extreme risk” category and what it means for credit unions ✅ The role of examiner judgment in assessing interest rate risk under the new guidance ✅ How credit unions can mitigate risk and avoid a Document of Resolution (DOR) ✅ The growing importance of liquidity management and how credit unions should prepare ✅ Why examiner scrutiny of IRR is increasing, despite the removal of automatic DORs Key Takeaways from the NCUA Webinar: 🔹 NCUA clarified that interest rate risk remains a top supervisory priority for 2023 and beyond. 🔹 Credit unions must demonstrate strong risk management practices to avoid regulatory action. 🔹 Liquidity risks are increasing due to rising rates and market shifts—credit unions should reassess their funding strategies. 🔹 Open communication with examiners is essential—proactive discussions can help avoid surprises. Resources Mentioned in This Episode: 📄 NCUA’s Letter to Credit Unions (22-CU-09) : [Insert link if available] 🎥 NCUA’s Stakeholder Webinar on Interest Rate Risk : [Insert link if available] 🔍 Learn more about Credit Union Exam Solutions: marktretchel.com Subscribe & Stay Connected…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ A quick-hit episode this week! Mark shares thoughts on Duke’s March Madness collapse, the rise of Rodney Hood at OCC, Jim Nussle’s pending retirement, and NCUA’s buyout offers. Plus, a few takes on market volatility, sub debt approvals, and the ever-shifting dynamics at the NCUA Board. Topics Covered: Duke’s tourney loss and dynasty hate Rodney Hood's possible FDIC move Jim Nussle’s retirement news NCUA staff buyouts and exam slowdowns The case for sub debt Market drops and flight to quality…
 
Episode Title: NCUA: Can You Put That in an Examiner Finding, Not a DOR? Episode Summary: In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel is joined by Steve Farrar and Todd Miller to unpack the complexities of NCUA examinations, examiner findings, and documents of resolution (DOORS). They dive into what makes an issue rise to a DOOR, how credit unions can negotiate findings, and why corporate governance is becoming a focal point in exams. With their decades of experience inside NCUA, Mark, Steve, and Todd share insights on how credit unions can better navigate the regulatory process, avoid unnecessary compliance burdens, and strengthen their governance structures. If you've ever wondered why something lands in a DOOR rather than an examiner finding, this episode is for you! Key Topics Covered: ✔️ What qualifies as an examiner finding vs. a DOOR? ✔️ How credit unions can respond to and negotiate with NCUA ✔️ The rising focus on corporate governance in examinations ✔️ How unresolved examiner findings escalate over time ✔️ The role of supplementary facts in the examination process ✔️ Understanding regional director letters and enforcement trends Guest Information: 🎙 Steve Farrar – Former NCUA official with 30+ years of experience in risk management, enforcement, and problem case resolution. 🎙 Todd Miller – Former NCUA examiner, capital market specialist, and director of special actions, with 35 years of regulatory expertise. Host Information: 🎙 Mark Treichel – Former NCUA executive and credit union expert, dedicated to helping credit unions optimize their exam results. Resources Mentioned: 🔗 MarkTreichel.com – Learn more about Credit Union Exam Solutions 🔗 NCUA CAMELS Rating System 🔗 FDIC Proposed Corporate Governance Guidance Subscribe & Follow: 🔔 Never miss an episode! Subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or your favorite podcast app. 📩 ] 👉 If you found this episode valuable, please leave us a rating and review!…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ In this episode of With Flying Colors , Mark Treichel is joined by Jason Stverak , Chief Advocacy Officer of the Defense Credit Union Council (DCUC) , for a wide-ranging conversation on the unique role defense credit unions play in serving military members—and the policy battles threatening their ability to do so. Jason shares how DCUC advocates for military-affiliated credit unions across a rapidly evolving regulatory and political landscape. From the impact of the Credit Card Competition Act on interchange fees to the overdraft protection debate and the ongoing defense of the credit union tax exemption , this episode dives deep into the issues shaping the future of service-based financial institutions. You’ll also hear powerful real-world stories—including how Navy Federal helped a young Marine avoid a predatory car loan , and how Enbright Credit Union supports members battling cancer —that illustrate the mission-first, member-first mindset of credit unions in action. 🔍 Topics Covered: What DCUC is and who it serves Why interchange income matters, especially for defense credit unions The Credit Card Competition Act: risks and real-world impacts Overdraft protection and CFPB’s regulatory shifts The importance of preserving the credit union tax status Real stories of credit unions stepping in when members need them most 👤 Guest: Jason Stverak Chief Advocacy Officer, Defense Credit Union Council 🔗 DCUC.org…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Episode Summary: In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel is joined by Steve Farrar and Todd Miller from Credit Union Exam Solutions to discuss the serious implications of a CAMEL Code 4 rating. A downgrade to CAMEL 4 signals significant risk and increased regulatory scrutiny. What does this mean for your credit union? What immediate actions should management and the board take? How does this impact borrowing, liquidity, and operations? Get expert insights into navigating the challenges of CAMEL 4 and what steps to take to get back on track. What You’ll Learn in This Episode: ✅ What is a CAMEL Code 4? Understanding why it’s a major red flag ✅ How NCUA views CAMEL 4 credit unions and why they ramp up oversight ✅ The consequences of a downgrade – more frequent exams, lost privileges, and reputational risk ✅ NCUA’s administrative actions – what happens when you receive a Letter of Understanding & Agreement (LUA) ✅ How a CAMEL 4 affects your liquidity – Federal Reserve & Federal Home Loan Bank implications ✅ The impact on borrowing & collateral requirements ✅ The role of the board in a CAMEL 4 credit union – what’s expected of leadership ✅ Can a CAMEL 4 credit union recover? Strategies for improvement Key Takeaways: 🔹 CAMEL 4 credit unions face exams every 120 days , meaning examiners are always present 🔹 Expect Letters of Understanding & Agreements (LUAs) and preliminary warning letters 🔹 NCUA and federal agencies (like the Federal Reserve & FHLB) are notified , impacting borrowing & liquidity 🔹 The board and management face increased accountability , with NCUA requiring approval for senior leadership changes 🔹 A downgrade to CAMEL 4 means administrative oversight , and in some cases, public disclosure (depending on state regulations) 🔹 Credit unions in this category must act quickly to stabilize finances and demonstrate improvement to avoid further decline Resources Mentioned: 📌 NCUA’s National Supervision Policy Manual (for details on CAMEL 4 oversight) 📌 NCUA’s Share Insurance Briefing (for trends in CAMEL ratings) 📌 Credit Union Exam Solutions – Expert consulting for navigating NCUA exams Connect With Us: 🌐 Visit marktreichel.com for expert guidance on NCUA exams 📩 Have a question or topic suggestion? Email us at [your email/contact info] 📲 Follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook for more credit union insights…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel is joined by Steve Farrar and Todd Miller to analyze the latest trends shaping the credit union industry in 2024. They dive into the recently released NCUA data, discussing multi-year trends, economic pressures, and how credit unions are navigating challenges such as rising delinquencies, declining net income, and shifting liquidity conditions. Key Topics Covered: ✅ Multi-Year Credit Union Trends – How decisions made during COVID-19 continue to impact the industry today ✅ Rising Credit Risk & Loan Performance – What’s driving the surge in credit card and auto loan delinquencies? ✅ NCUA’s Supervisory Priorities – Where examiners are focusing their attention in 2024 ✅ Liquidity & Interest Rate Risk – How credit unions are adjusting to changing market conditions ✅ Earnings & Profitability Pressures – Understanding the impact of fee income declines, provision for loan losses, and economic uncertainty ✅ Regulatory Challenges & Mergers – The latest data on credit union consolidations and how they compare to community banks Recent Exam Trends: 🔹 Increased scrutiny on commercial lending programs and credit concentration limits 🔹 More emphasis on profitability analysis at the loan program level 🔹 Examiners pushing for stronger liquidity contingency funding plans 🔹 Greater focus on enterprise risk management in larger credit unions 🎧 Listen now to get the full breakdown of the latest trends and how they could impact your credit union’s operations. Resources & Related Episodes: 📌 Want to learn more about specific regulatory issues? Check out our past episodes on: 🔹 Commercial Lending Risks & Best Practices 🔹 Managing Interest Rate & Liquidity Risk 🔹 Navigating NCUA’s Supervisory Priorities 🔗 Subscribe to With Flying Colors for the latest insights into credit union regulations and strategy!…
 
So You're a CAMEL Code 3 – Now What? 🎙 Episode Title: So You’re a CAMEL Code 3 – Now What? Episode Summary: In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel is joined by Steve Farrar and Todd Miller from Credit Union Exam Solutions to discuss what happens when a credit union is downgraded to a CAMEL Code 3 . They break down the implications of this rating, what it means for credit union management, and how to navigate increased NCUA supervision effectively. What You’ll Learn in This Episode: ✅ What is a CAMEL Code 3? Understanding the rating and why it matters ✅ How NCUA views CAMEL 3 credit unions and what it means for supervision ✅ The impact of a CAMEL 3 downgrade on credit union operations and oversight ✅ What to expect during follow-up exams and how often NCUA will visit ✅ Documents of Resolution (DORs): What they are and how to handle them ✅ Regional Director Letters (RDLs): Why you might receive one and how to respond ✅ State vs. Federal Charters: Differences in how NCUA approaches CAMEL 3 credit unions ✅ The path back to a better rating: Steps credit unions can take to return to a CAMEL 2 Key Takeaways: 🔹 Credit unions rated CAMEL 3 face increased supervision , typically two visits per year 🔹 Documents of Resolution (DORs) set deadlines for corrective actions, often tied to follow-up exams 🔹 Regional Director Letters (RDLs) are common and signal heightened regulatory concerns 🔹 Management and boards must track and report progress on corrective actions to avoid further downgrades 🔹 Follow-up exams rarely lead to an immediate upgrade , so credit unions should plan for at least 20 months of heightened oversight 🔹 Recordkeeping and BSA violations trigger even more frequent exams , sometimes every 90 days Resources Mentioned: 📌 NCUA’s National Supervision Policy Manual (for details on CAMEL 3 oversight) 📌 NCUA’s Share Insurance Briefing (for trends in CAMEL ratings) 📌 Credit Union Exam Solutions – Learn more about expert consulting to help navigate NCUA exams…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ NCUA Predictions: What Will the Do in 2025? Treichel: [00:00:00] Hey everyone, this is Mark Treichel with another episode of With Flying Colors. Today I am flying solo and I am calling this podcast something like what I expect from NCUA in 2025. In preparing for today's show, I took some notes going back and looking at NCUA's Agenda from their board action taken in 2025 and am gleaning based on the Trump administration and the Helpman leadership. What may or what may not happen in 2025 compared to 2024. When you go back and look at 2025. They had canceled two board meetings. So that was one takeaway. They canceled the March, 2024 board meeting, which was the first time in a long time that that had happened. And they canceled the June, 2024 meeting. So this was under then [00:01:00] chairman Todd Harper, who is now a board member at large, although he came close to being named vice chair, and you can check out some of my past podcasts for discussions on why that may have blown up anyway. It things continue to blow up at the board level, but I'll get to that here shortly. All right. They canceled 2 board meetings and they held for N. C. U. S. I. F. share insurance fund briefings. I report on those quite a bit here and on linked in because that's 1 of the few windows to generic camel code ratings. You can see when camel code ratings go up and they did 4 of those. in 2024. I'm expecting they'll do four of those in 2025. They did one cyber security update briefing and they did a new charter update and briefing and tip to what I might say in the future. I think there will be more briefings because I don't think the board will be acting on much because I don't think the board [00:02:00] is currently getting along because of the kerfuffle on NSF and overdraft fees. All right. So other things they did they did a proposed succession planning rule and a final succession planning rule. They did an incentive based compensation proposal, which I think will go nowhere in 2025. That was put out there because Biden's administration required it from all. Banking agencies and under the Trump administration there will be less or zero regulation. And I don't see them wanting to put proposals in on incentives. If you'd know what I mean. In July, there was a loan rate ceiling approval to. re approve utilization of the 18 percent rate. That's what they do every time. The trade associations come out saying you should allow that to go up or you should make it based on variability. If NCOA was ever going to raise it, it would have been last year and or the year before. They [00:03:00] didn't seize that opportunity because they thought it would have been egregiously harmful to credit unions and credit union members. I disagree with that, but they will vote on that again because they have to vote on it and they will likely just do what they've done umpteen years in a row, which is reaffirmed the 18%. I expect that to happen in July again. All right. What else is going to be happening? Potentially, they did have a board appeal in August. By the way, they typically don't have open board meetings in August. That was a closed a closed item where a credit union appealed something without revealing what I know relative to that. That was a field of membership appeal. There was a fair hiring and banking proposal, which doesn't need to repeat in 2025. They simplified the insurance rules. And then when you get close to the end of the year, what happens at the end of the year and CUA approves their budget. But before they approve their budget, they do a budget briefing. A little [00:04:00] bit of history on the budget briefings. The budget briefing started when I was the deputy executive director and they were started by Dennis Dollar. And I remember saying to that executive director, Len Skiles, if you do this, Make sure you want to do it and it was for transparency. But once you start something, it's very difficult to stop it. And I'll get to that and why I'm making that point. I'll get to it now, but I'll refer to it again. So NCOA did stop it. I believe it was under the Matt's administration and the trade associations got upset because that was their opportunity. One of their opportunities to show value saying your budget's too high. Here's why we think it's too high. And through assistance from Senator Mark Warner in Virginia, they were able to get the Federal Credit Union Act proposed, requiring NCUA to do a budget briefing. They are required to do a budget briefing. I believe they will do a budget briefing. I'm not so sure they will do a budget. They're not [00:05:00] required to do a budget, and they are required to do a budget briefing. They're not required to do a budget, and that's because there is a two year budget. So I'll get to that and why I think that they may not do a budget when we walk through what I think will happen in totality in 2025. The NCOA approved their annual performance plan, which is linked to their strategic plan, already in January. That was one of the last things they did prior to Hauptmann taking over. So they don't need to do that annual plan, but they do need to do another strategic plan, and that would be due by the end of 2025 for the years 2026 through 2030. Will they do that? We will see. All right. So when you look at what is going to happen and what I predict will happen in 2024, that's a little bit about what happened. What I'm predicting in 2024 is that the theme of canceling board meetings will continue. They, as I mentioned, they canceled March and June. I'm [00:06:00] expecting that they may cancel April or May. Or June or July, I don't believe they're going to have enough briefings to keep an agenda full. I don't believe they're going to agree on enough things because of the arguments they're having about about NSF fees and overdraft fees being reported by over a billion dollar credit unions. There's two approaches here. Kyle Hauptman canceled and changed the. Way that billion dollar plus credit unions were going were reporting for three quarters on NSFs and overdrafts saying that it's overkill and it's onerous on the credit unions, et cetera, et cetera, and that they would be looking at that during part of the examinations and then after he announced that at GAC and then. Board member Harper and board member Otsuka came out with their own press releases, and I understand they did a full court press on [00:07:00] Capitol Hill on the topic and came out saying that what's wrong with transparency? There should be transparency here. Why are you stopping something that was started and that credit unions had been providing and that's bad for members? So that's the nexus I wanted to say where I mentioned with Dennis Dollar that when he started the budget briefings, I thought they would never be stopped. And it's hard to stop something when you do. What happened? Debbie Matt stopped the budget briefings, and then lo and behold, the Federal Credit Union Act was changed and INSU 8 was required. to do that. So at some point, whether it's when the next time there's a D in the White House or there's a D in running the Dems have control of Congress. And the White House, you're going to see more on the fee situation. You're going to see NCOA go back to collecting this data. Will it be in 4 years? Will it be in 8 years? Will it be sometime sooner than that? [00:08:00] My guess is not before the four year period. I can't see how it went flip floppi...…
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of With Flying Colors , Mark Treichel, along with industry experts Steve Farrar and Todd Miller, discuss a growing trend—NCUA requesting private meetings with credit union boards. What does it mean when regulators ask to meet without management present? Should boards be concerned? And how should they prepare? With decades of NCUA experience, Steve and Todd share insights into: ✅ Common reasons why NCUA requests board-only meetings ✅ When a meeting with the board chair is routine vs. when it’s a red flag ✅ The importance of listening, but not committing to actions during these meetings ✅ Why legal counsel might be necessary in certain situations ✅ Whether you should record the meeting—and if NCUA will allow it Mark, Steve, and Todd also share real-world examples of how these meetings have played out, including situations where state regulators took a more aggressive approach. Whether you're a board member, CEO, or concerned about your next NCUA exam, this episode provides essential insights to ensure you're prepared if NCUA makes the call. Resources Mentioned: 📌 Learn more about Credit Union Exam Solutions: marktreichel.com 📌 Subscribe for future episodes and expert insights on navigating NCUA exams.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Did NCUA just vote on its reorganization plan? Time will tell. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/latest-memos/guidance-on-agency-rif-and-reorganization-plans-requested-by-implementing-the-president-s-department-of-government-efficiency-workforce-optimization-initiative.pdf…
 
"Liquidity Management: Reading Between the Lines of NCUA's Latest Guidance" In this insightful episode, Mark Treichel and former NCUA Capital Markets Specialist Todd Miller analyze NCUA's April 2023 liquidity webinar and provide their expert take on the agency's current perspective on liquidity management. Episode Highlights: Todd Miller shares his 34-year experience at NCUA, including his roles as a regional capital market specialist and director of special actions Key liquidity guidance documents discussed: 2010 Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management, 2013 CU 10 guidance on Regulation 741.12, and the 2023 addendum on contingency funding plans Analysis of credit union deposit composition changes: from 55% in money markets, CDs, and wholesale funding in 2009 to 52% currently Discussion of "reversion to the mean" in deposit mix and how credit unions have adapted to the rate environment Examination inconsistencies: varying liquidity ratios and expectations from examiner to examiner The importance of forward-looking liquidity management versus "rear-view mirror" approaches Disconnect between NCUA's public statements (e.g., "supervisory test is not how credit unions should manage interest rate risk") and examiner actions How improved analytics allow credit unions to operate with lower cash holdings while still managing risk effectively The appropriate use of wholesale funding, borrowings, and non-member deposits in liquidity management Why well-capitalized credit unions with good asset quality will generally maintain access to liquidity Resources Mentioned: 2010 Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management 2013 CU 10 guidance on NCUA Regulation 741.12 2023 addendum to the 2010 interagency statement on funding and liquidity risk If you're concerned about your credit union's next NCUA exam, visit marktreichel.com to learn how Credit Union Exam Solutions can help you navigate the examination process successfully.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Episode Title: "Credit Unions at a Crossroads: Regulator Consolidation and the Tax Threat" With Flying Colors Podcast | Episode [Number] | Released February [XX], 2025 Host: Mark Treichel Guest: John McKechnie, John Ney LLC, Credit Union Policy Expert Overview: In this timely episode, recorded just ahead of the 2025 Governmental Affairs Conference (GAC), Mark Treichel sits down with John McKechnie, a seasoned credit union advocate and former NCUA insider, to unpack the seismic shifts brewing in Washington, D.C. With the Trump administration signaling a potential overhaul of financial regulators and whispers of taxing credit unions, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Will NCUA get swept into a bank-dominated regulatory merger? Could the credit union tax exemption be on the chopping block? John and Mark dive into the uncertainty, the risks, and what it all means for the credit union movement. Key Discussion Points: Regulatory Consolidation Buzz: The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg report on merging FDIC and OCC into Treasury—what does this mean for NCUA and credit unions? John shares insights from Capitol Hill, including a revealing chat with Senator Tim Scott’s staff. The Share Insurance Fund Risk: How a consolidated regulator could swallow the credit union-backed fund into a bank-centric FDIC system. Taxation Tensions: Banks push to tax “mega” credit unions—are we facing a divide-and-conquer strategy? John breaks down the political and economic arguments credit unions must wield. Exam Burden Reality: NCUA’s lighter touch vs. bank regulators—could credit unions face 35% more scrutiny under a merged system? GAC Game Plan: Why this year’s hill visits might be the most critical yet, and how credit union advocates can make their voices heard. CFPB’s Future: A leaner, less aggressive CFPB under Trump—good news or a distraction from bigger threats? Notable Quotes: “The deck is being reshuffled right now, and I think credit unions should be concerned.” – John McKechnie “If you eliminate the credit union tax exemption, you’re raising taxes on 220,000 of your constituents.” – John McKechnie “This GAC could be as important as any visit to D.C. the movement has ever had.” – Mark Treichel Why Listen? With uncertainty as the word of the day, this episode is your insider’s guide to the regulatory and legislative battles that could redefine credit unions. Whether you’re flying into GAC or tracking policy from afar, Mark and John deliver the wisdom you need to understand the stakes—and what’s next.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ The Perfect Storm: Credit Risk and Modern Collections with David Reed In this episode, Mark Treichel sits down with David Reed, of Reed & Jolly law firm, to discuss the pressing issue of credit risk and loan quality in credit unions. As a former in-house counsel and collections manager turned credit union attorney, Reed brings unique insights into modern collection challenges and solutions. Key Topics: Analysis of NCUA's 2024 Supervisory Priorities letter and its unprecedented focus on credit risk Record-high delinquency rates in credit cards and used car loans The need to modernize collection practices with new technology and communication methods Importance of board reporting and corporate governance in managing credit risk Balancing member service with sound financial practices in today's economic environment Guest: David Reed Contact: david@reedandjolly.com | 703-675-9578…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Show Notes: With Flying Colors - Interview with Mike Macchiarola of Olden Lane Guest: Mike Macchiarola, Olden Lane (broker-dealer and investment advisor serving credit unions) Key Topics Discussed: - Interest Rate Environment: Impact of "higher for longer" rates on credit unions, with industry cost of funds rising to 218 basis points - Regulatory Changes: Shift in regulatory focus under new NCUA leadership and potential Trump administration impacts - Consolidation Trends: Record year for credit union-bank transactions (22 in 2023) and increasing branch deal activity - Technology & AI: Growing importance of digital platforms while maintaining personal touch ("clicks and mortars") - Profitability Challenges: Industry ROA at 64 basis points with significant variance across institutions - Leadership Demographics: Addressing aging C-suite and board populations while attracting younger talent - Consumer Financial Health: Rising credit card delinquencies (11%) and increasing household debt levels - Fee Income: Evolving regulatory landscape around NSF and overdraft fees Contact Information: - Website: www.oldenlane.com - LinkedIn: Mike Macchiarola - Email: Available through contact form on Olden Lane website Notable Quote: "If it don't make sense, it don't make dollars." - Mike Macchiarola on credit union profitability…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Press Releases Secretary Bessent Announces Intention to Appoint First Deputy Comptroller of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency February 7, 2025 WASHINGTON – Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent today announced his intention to appoint Rodney E. Hood as a Deputy Comptroller and to designate him the First Deputy Comptroller of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). In this role, Mr. Hood will also serve as Acting Comptroller of the Currency. “The strong leadership and career experience of Rodney Hood will strengthen the OCC’s efforts to ensure the safety and soundness of the banking system while also enhancing economic growth," said Secretary Bessent. “I remain steadfastly committed to serving the American people and the banking system by creating a regulatory structure that fulfills our obligations, fosters innovation, and promotes financial inclusion, including those Americans who have been debanked and underserved,” said Mr. Hood. The OCC is a bureau within the Department of the Treasury, and the Comptroller of the Currency is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. By statute (12 U.S.C. § 4), the Treasury Secretary is responsible for appointing up to four Deputy Comptrollers of the Currency and designating one as the First Deputy Comptroller. During a vacancy in the position of Comptroller, the First Deputy Comptroller possesses the powers and performs the duties of the office of Comptroller. Mr. Hood was previously confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 2005 and again in 2019 to serve on the National Credit Union Administration Board. In 2019, President Donald J. Trump designated him as Chairman of the NCUA Board. Before entering public service, Mr. Hood held senior roles in retail finance, commercial banking, affordable housing, and community development at JPMorgan Chase, GE Capital, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company. A North Carolina native, Mr. Hood holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Key Topics to Include: Economic data and analysis Financial statement review Key performance/risk indicators Liquidity reporting Interest rate risk analysis Investment portfolio oversight Scenario testing and stress analysis Model validation and risk assessment Credit risk integration Documentation and minutes…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Summary: In this special Archive episode of With Flying Colors, Mark explores the meaning and implications of "agreed upon corrective action" in credit union examinations. Drawing from his experience at NCUA, Mark explains how this term appears on examination reports and why its proper implementation is crucial for credit unions. Key Points Covered: Mark begins by breaking down the literal meaning of "agreed upon" using dictionary definitions, emphasizing that it means coming to a mutual arrangement or understanding. He shares a recent case where a small credit union reached out about their examination frustrations, highlighting how the agreed-upon process can sometimes break down. The Process: The examination report process typically includes a draft phase where credit unions can review and discuss findings with examiners. However, due to year-end pressures and internal goals, sometimes reports are finalized without proper consultation. Mark explains that the examination report's cover page explicitly states it should document "agreed upon corrective actions," making it important for credit unions to ensure they actually have input in this process. Recommendations for Credit Unions: Mark advises credit unions to push back when they don't receive proper opportunity for input. He suggests starting with the examiner, then moving up to the supervisory examiner if necessary. While NCUA has final authority on safety and soundness issues, credit unions should still receive the opportunity to influence report language to better serve their needs and their members' interests. Important Context: The podcast notes that NCUA implemented a higher level of review for examination reports, requiring supervisory review. While this creates more consistency, it can sometimes make immediate dialogue more challenging, especially when reports are delivered as final without prior discussion. Closing Thoughts: Mark emphasizes that credit unions must decide when to "go along to get along" versus when to advocate for changes. The goal should be finding language that satisfies both NCUA's safety and soundness requirements and the credit union's operational needs. Contact Information: Listeners can learn more about Mark's services at markteichel.com. The podcast releases new episodes once or twice weekly, providing expert insights on achieving success with NCUA.…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Kyle S. Hauptman Designated as NCUA Board Chairman ALEXANDRIA, Va. (Jan. 22, 2025) – President Donald J. Trump has National Credit Union Administration Vice Chairman Kyle S. Hauptman as the thirteenth Chairman of the NCUA Board. “I am deeply honored that President Trump has asked me to serve as Chairman of NCUA,” Chairman Hauptman said. “I look forward to leading the agency’s dedicated professionals and working with my Board colleagues to create a regulatory structure that promotes growth, opportunity, and innovation within the credit union system. “My priorities as Chairman include: Re-examining the current NCUA budgeting process. Convening groups of NCUA employees to identify achievable internal efficiencies to reduce unnecessary frictions in the agency’s operations. Promoting the appropriate use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for NCUA employees. One goal is enhancing productivity, but it’s also true that regulators who use technologies are more apt to understand why the regulated use them. Focusing on true financial inclusion, which means removing barriers to de novo credit unions and removing the ‘pain points’ that have led to fewer and fewer small credit unions. NCUA should be mindful that the only people who think compliance is easy are those that don’t have to do it. Codifying our procedures to protect Americans from regulation-by-enforcement. For example, no enforcement action should ever set - even clarify - policy. In America and other free societies, the sequence is: set speed limits, then give speeding tickets (no one has any obligation to be aware of someone else’s ticket). Making clear that credit unions and their members are best positioned to assess their communities’ climate risks. Re-assessing NCUA policies that may, even inadvertently, dissuade credit unions from serving low-income areas. This includes language around overdraft policies, particularly for credit unions located in states with especially punitive government late fees/penalties. Right-sizing credit unions’ obligations where possible under the Bank Secrecy Act, including NCUA’s regulations surrounding Suspicious Activity Reports.”…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Episode Summary : In this episode of With Flying Colors , host Mark Treichel sits down with Steve Farrar, a former NCUA examiner and capital expert, to discuss the complexities of credit union capital management. With decades of experience, Steve shares insights into the evolution of capital regulations, the purpose of regulatory capital, and the challenges credit unions face in maintaining the right balance between risk and growth. Key Takeaways : Steve Farr’s Background : Steve shares his extensive career journey, from starting as an NCUA examiner in 1987 to becoming a key player in regulatory capital rulemaking. Purpose of Regulatory Capital : Understand why capital is essential for credit unions, from absorbing losses to maintaining public confidence. Net Worth Ratios and PCA : Dive into the history and significance of net worth ratios in ensuring credit union stability. New Complex Credit Union Leverage Ratio (CCULR) : Learn about the simplified capital adequacy measure introduced in 2023 and its implications for credit unions. Risk-Based Capital : Explore how this tool provides credit unions with a tailored perspective on their capital adequacy. Capital Management Strategies : Discover best practices for developing a capital plan that aligns with your credit union’s unique risks and opportunities. Listener Questions : Have questions about credit union capital or topics from today’s episode? Send them to Mark via email at cu.exam.solutions@marktreichel.com or through his website at www.marktreichel.com . Your question might be featured in a future episode! Contact Information : For consulting inquiries or to learn more about how Mark and Steve can assist your credit union, reach out using the above contact details. Closing Thoughts : This episode highlights the importance of a strategic approach to capital management. Whether you’re grappling with regulatory requirements or looking to optimize your capital structure, this conversation offers valuable guidance for credit union leaders…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ ## Episode Summary: NSF and Overdraft Fees - What You Need to Know In this episode, Mark Treichel interviews Joe Goldberg, former director of the NCUA's division of consumer compliance policy and outreach, about the December 2024 NCUA letter addressing consumer harm from certain overdraft and NSF fee practices. ### Key Topics Covered: Joe Goldberg discusses NCUA's recent guidance on problematic overdraft fee practices, including: 1. Authorized Positive Settled Negative (APSN) fees - When a debit transaction is approved with sufficient funds but settles negative due to intervening transactions 2. Multiple re-presentment fees - When members are charged multiple NSF fees for the same check/ACH item being represented 3. Return Deposited Item (RDI) fees - When members are charged for depositing third-party checks that are returned The episode also covers: - NCUA's historical approach to overdraft oversight since 2005 - Risk management principles credit unions should consider - The agency's current supervisory approach and expectations - New research findings on overdraft/NSF fee revenue at credit unions ### Key Takeaways: - Credit unions should review their overdraft programs for compliance with current guidance - Self-identification and correction of issues is viewed favorably by NCUA - Overdraft/NSF fees typically comprise 2-5% of credit union revenue - The agency will continue monitoring these fees through call report data - Credit unions should ensure fee practices are fair and clearly disclosed to members ### Featured Guest: Joe Goldberg - Former Director, Division of Consumer Compliance Policy and Outreach at NCUA (2014-2021) ### Host: Mark Treichel - With Flying Colors Podcast…
 
www.marktreichel.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ Episode Description: In this special archive episode of With Flying Colors , Mark shares valuable insights from his years of experience in credit union examination and consulting. Broadcasting straight from the beach, he breaks down the top 10 ways credit unions can avoid receiving a Document of Resolution (DOR) from the NCUA. Whether you're preparing for an exam or just looking to fine-tune your operations, these practical tips will help ensure compliance and maintain a smooth examination process. What You'll Learn in This Episode: Understanding Document Resolutions (DOR): What they are, why they occur, and how to avoid them. Key Triggers for DORs: Common issues such as violations of regulations, policies, or strategic plans. Proven Strategies: How to communicate, negotiate, and train effectively to avoid potential pitfalls. Best Practices: Mark’s insights on proactive planning, staying informed, and maintaining good examiner relationships. Top 10 Tips Highlighted in This Episode: Comply with the Federal Credit Union Act and NCUA regulations. Follow your organization's policies diligently. Stick to your approved strategic plan or adjust it responsibly. Communicate effectively with NCUA examiners. Negotiate issues identified during the examination process. Invest in training for staff, boards, and committees. Stay updated with regulatory changes by subscribing to NCUA Express. Listen to informative podcasts like With Flying Colors and Credit Union Regulatory Guidance . Avoid accounting problems by ensuring reconciliations and timely audits. Make senior leadership accessible to examiners during the examination process. Resources Mentioned: NCUA Express Credit Union Regulatory Guidance podcast Mark’s consulting services for NCUA examination support Call to Action: If you enjoyed this episode, don’t forget to subscribe to With Flying Colors for more actionable tips and insights into navigating NCUA exams and credit union compliance. Ratings and reviews on Apple Podcasts and Spotify are always appreciated!…
 
Loading …

Willkommen auf Player FM!

Player FM scannt gerade das Web nach Podcasts mit hoher Qualität, die du genießen kannst. Es ist die beste Podcast-App und funktioniert auf Android, iPhone und im Web. Melde dich an, um Abos geräteübergreifend zu synchronisieren.

 

icon Daily Deals
icon Daily Deals
icon Daily Deals

Kurzanleitung

Hören Sie sich diese Show an, während Sie die Gegend erkunden
Abspielen